Imposition of penalties u/s 112 and section 114AA - illegal ...

Penalties for Illegal Import of Drawings u/ss 112 & 114AA Overturned Due to Lack of Export Evidence.

June 13, 2019

Case Laws Customs AT

Imposition of penalties u/s 112 and section 114AA - illegal import or re-import of Drawings - In the clear absence of record of export, no credence can be given to this assumption, without invoking the consequence of illicit export, and which has then gone on to attribute responsibility for such to the appellants herein. The penalties must fail on that flimsiness too.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Imposition of penalties u/s 112 and section 114AA - illegal ...

Penalties for Illegal Import of Drawings u/ss 112 & 114AA Overturned Due to Lack of Export Evidence.

June 13, 2019

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Appellate Tribunal set aside penalties imposed on licensed money exchanger for alleged illegal export of currency and import of gold. Observed no evidence of illegal...

Appellant's penalties u/ss 112(a), 112(b), and 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 set aside. Reliance solely on co-accused statements without corroborative evidence found...

Importation of an old and used car by misdeclaring it as new, resulting in undervaluation. Imposition of composite penalty u/ss 112(a), 112(b), and 114AA of the Customs...

CESTAT Mumbai held that confiscation of imported goods and imposition of penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act for forged Special Import Licenses lacked clear evidence...

Imposition of penalties on the appellants u/ss 112(a) and 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962. The adjudicating authority failed to consider the appellants' request for...

The case involved valuation of imported goods, undervaluation, admissibility of appellant's statement u/s 108, documentary evidence, computer printouts u/s 138C,...

Imposition of Penalties u/s 112(a) & (b) and 114AA - Each appellant denied direct involvement or knowledge of the illegal activities, claiming to have played different...

Levy of penalty u/s 112 & 114 of the Customs Act, 1962 - allegation of abating the importer - In present import, there is no evidence to allege that appellants were...

Customs case involving alleged undervaluation of imported goods and demand of illegal gratification by a Customs officer. The Tribunal found the statements of co-accused...

Mis-declaration of quantity and value of goods in SEZ unit - penalty u/ss 112(a) and 114A of Customs Act 1962. Option for reduced 25% penalty u/s 114A to be extended if...

The case involved penalties u/ss 112(a) and 112(b) of the Customs Act for smuggling foreign gold. The tribunal held that statements without cross-examination are...

Imported goods classified under Customs Tariff Item (CTI) 8714 10 90 or 8714 91 00 - General Rules of Interpretation applied for classification - Goods rightly...

CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, considered a case involving penalty u/s 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 on a co-noticee who is a Partner in a Customs Broker firm for...

Levy of penalty on CHA u/s 112(a) and Section 114AA of the Customs Act 1962 - misdeclared goods - Abetting in illegal imports - The appellant has this certainly rendered...

Penalty u/s 112(a) and 114AA of CA - import of High end cars / Sports Utility Vehicles - appellant admitted that the value of the imported goods had been mis-declared...

Quick Updates: