Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights July 2019 Year 2019 This

Revenue Appeal against one order of Commissioner Appeal whereas ...

Central Excise

July 17, 2019

Revenue Appeal against one order of Commissioner Appeal whereas Commission has decided two cases simultaneously on similar issues - Though res judicata may not strictly apply to the orders passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), but the aid of such principles can be taken. In the present case if this appeal is allowed, two inconsistent orders will come into existence. The present appeal, therefore, is liable to be dismissed for this reason.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Manufacturing of gutkha - Installation of two packing machines whereas only one machine was declared - mere installation is sufficient - Rule implies that use and...

  2. Law for trial of the cross cases - Raid - In the present controversy, two different criminal appeals were being heard and decided against two different judgments based...

  3. Power of attorney (GPA) to non relatives in respect of immovable property - payment of full stamp duty in case of GPA - Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Decided in favor of revenue - SC

  4. Cenvat Credit on M.S. scrap - first stage / second stage dealer - dealer could not produce purchase invoice of M.S. scrap supplied to the applicant - prima facie case is...

  5. SVLDRS - the second declaration was filed on 10.01.2020 whereas the first declaration was rejected on 12.02.2020 - the quantum of service tax liability of the petitioner...

  6. Dispute regarding classification of pin mailer - printed continuous computer stationery - assessee contending the same to fall under Chapter 49 of the tariff whereas...

  7. Disallowance on account of foreign exchange fluctuation loss - It is an undisputed fact that for the assessment year 2012-13, 2013-14 and 2016-17, the assessee declared...

  8. Treatment of sales tax refund as income under section 41(1) - Decided against the revenue.

  9. Penalty u/s 158BFA(2) - period of limitation - relevant date - on the issue of additions, ITAT and HC decided the matter in favor of assessee whereas Supreme Court has...

  10. Whether the appellant had violated Section 9(1)(b) of FERA - transaction to sell the flats to the two directors were non resident Indians - decided in favor of appellant - HC

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates