CIR process - Petitioner and the Debtor entered into Power ...

Petition Dismissed: No Binding Agreement for Corporate Debtor to Consume 60,00,000 Units Annually Under Power Purchase Agreement.

July 20, 2019

Case Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Tri

CIR process - Petitioner and the Debtor entered into Power Purchase Agreement for supply of 20,00,000 units - since no agreement between the parties obligating the Corporate Debtor to consume 60,00,000 units per year - there is no existence of debt - Petition dismissed

View Source

← Previous Next →

CIR process - Petitioner and the Debtor entered into Power ...

Petition Dismissed: No Binding Agreement for Corporate Debtor to Consume 60,00,000 Units Annually Under Power Purchase Agreement.

July 20, 2019

Case Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Tri

You may also like:

The NCLAT upheld the dismissal of a Section 7 petition filed by the appellant against the corporate debtor (CD), finding it was initiated with malicious intent. The...

CIRP proceedings - illegal transfer of IPR and business by the corporate debtor - the declaration of assignment of trademarks in the name of R1 is declared null and void...

Impact of Section 60(6) of the IBC - Exclusion of moratorium period for initiation of proceedings of suit - Interpreting the statute in the manner which the appellant...

The AT found evidence of hawala transactions through a recovered notebook containing daily business accounts, despite the appellant's retraction. The tribunal...

Income Tax: Limit of remuneration to working partners in partnership firms allowed as deduction increased - on first Rs 6,00,000 of book profit or loss, Rs 3,00,000 or...

The AT upheld the provisional attachment order against appellant's property despite being issued 190 days after the PAO, as the intervening COVID-19 period (15.03.2020...

HC addressed valuation dispute regarding exported Printed Circuit Boards where penalty was significantly increased from Rs.1,00,000 to Rs.1,00,00,000 in subsequent...

The court held that the tax liability arising from the deletion of additions under the remand order would be less than Rs. 1,00,00,000, rendering the appeal...

HC allowed the petition and set aside the impugned order and notice u/s 148A(b). AO failed to establish that petitioner had received any amount exceeding Rs. 50,00,000/-...

The HC allowed the petition and quashed the order rejecting the petitioner's refund claim of Rs. 40,00,000 deposited voluntarily by mistake. The HC held that the amount...

The CESTAT upheld the duty demand, confiscation of imported goods for non-fulfilment of export obligation u/s 111(o), imposition of redemption fine u/s 125, and...

Imported goods classification disputed - whether silver jewellery freely importable or restricted category under ITC (HS) Code 71069210. Court found respondent's...

Corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) initiated against corporate debtor and corporate guarantor. Financial creditor granted loan to corporate debtor, secured...

Imitation of CIRP - Admissibility of Intervention Petition - Homebuyers - Several intervention petitions were filed by unit holders in the project, seeking to dismiss...

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dismissed the appeal, upholding the order admitting the Section 7 application filed by ICICI Bank against the...

Quick Updates: