Imposition of penalties u/s 114 - Misuse of IEC - Appellant have ...

No Penalty Imposed Under Customs Act Section 114 for Unintentional Misuse of Importer Exporter Code by Appellant.

July 20, 2019

Case Laws Customs AT

Imposition of penalties u/s 114 - Misuse of IEC - Appellant have only unknowingly in good faith, allowed the use of their IE code. Thus, there is no case of imposition of penalty u/s 114 of the Customs Act made out.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Imposition of penalties u/s 114 - Misuse of IEC - Appellant have ...

No Penalty Imposed Under Customs Act Section 114 for Unintentional Misuse of Importer Exporter Code by Appellant.

July 20, 2019

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

HC dismissed the appeal, upholding penalties against the appellant for customs duty evasion. The court found the appellant's claims of merely lending his Importer...

Penalty u/s 117 of the Customs Act, 1962 was levied against appellants, Customs House Agents (CHAs), for not exercising due diligence. The allegation was that appellants...

Levy of Penalty on Customs Broker - pre-condition to restore the license - The case revolves around a Customs Broker who handled the clearance of household goods without...

Revocation of Customs Broker license - Regulation 10(n) requires the Customs Broker to verify correctness of Importer Exporter Code (IEC) number, Goods and Services Tax...

Levy of penalty on CHA - allegation of abetting some unscrupulous exporters - mens rea - The CHA are merely but processing agent on documents of clearance of goods...

Non-discharge of service tax - extended period invoked, service tax demanded - penalties imposed u/ss 77 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994 - appellant providing taxable...

Duty demand u/s 28(1) of Customs Act, 1962, upon importer and transferee of license issued by DGFT - Liability of transferee for fraudulently obtained license - Levy of...

Levy of penalty u/s 112 (a) of the Customs Act 1962 - Customs House Agent (CHA) - violation of Regulation 13 of CHALR 2004 - It is alleged that the appellant did not...

Appellant financed an individual for smuggling gold from Dubai and selling it in India. Penalty was imposed u/s 112(b)(i) of the Customs Act, 1962. The Commissioner held...

The appellants, who were neither exporters nor Customs House Agents (CHAs), were wrongly penalized u/ss 114 and 114AA for overvaluation of goods for claiming excess duty...

Levy of penalty u/s 114(i) of the Customs Act, 1962 on Customs Broker - All the allegations if any, would fall under the Customs Broker Licensing Regulations. No...

Revocation of CB license - first time export goods -The appellants CB in this case cannot be held responsible in cases where they have verified the identity of the...

The appeal challenges the revocation of customs broker license, forfeiture of security deposit, and penalty imposed for alleged violations of Regulations 10(d) and 10(n)...

Imposition of penalty u/s 112 (d) and 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 on Customs Broker - appellant was only a Customs Broker and not the importer - the only allegation...

Levy of penalty on customs broker - The Customs Broker has a very important position and has to safeguard the interest of both the importer and the Customs - The...

Quick Updates: