Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
VAT - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights August 2019 Year 2019 This

Rectification of mistake - in absence of any assessment order ...


Assessing Authority's Rectification Invalid Without Issued Assessment Order u/s 31; Entire Process Nullified.

August 1, 2019

Case Laws     VAT and Sales Tax     HC

Rectification of mistake - in absence of any assessment order issued by him there existed no basis to invoke the power of rectification u/s 31, by the assessing authority. Consequently, the assessing authority never acquired any jurisdiction to issue any notice or pass any order of rectification - The entire exercise carried by the assessing authority was a nullity and it must therefore necessarily fall.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Jurisdiction of rectification notice issued u/s 154 by the Income Tax Officer - authority competent to issue notices - Central Government has not made any scheme u/s...

  2. The case pertains to the scope of limited scrutiny by the assessing officer regarding computation of capital gains u/s 45 and providing exemption u/s 54B of the Income...

  3. The High Court held that the notice issued by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) u/s 148 was invalid as the provisions of Section 151A mandate that such notice...

  4. Section 142(1) notice issued by non-jurisdictional officer held valid. Plain reading of Section 143(2) indicates either Assessing Officer or prescribed income-tax...

  5. The High Court examined the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer (AO) and the prescribed income-tax authority to issue notices u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. It held...

  6. Validity of assessment order u/s 144C - petitioner filed objection to the draft assessment order well within the time of thirty days before the DRP - The High Court held...

  7. NCLAT quashed the order dated 10.03.2025 for procedural irregularities in exercising suo motu rectification powers under Rule 154 of NCLT Rules. The Tribunal's...

  8. Notices issued u/s 148 by Joint Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO) were held invalid due to lack of jurisdiction, as per Section 151A...

  9. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Fresh sanction under Section 151 - For a moment, even if accept Revenue’s contention that the present proceedings are continuation of...

  10. Jurisdiction - Additional Director General of DRI was a proper officer or not - The Additional Director General of DRI not having, in the first instance, assessed and...

  11. Cancellation of petitioner's registration - vague SCN - The particulars such as designation and office of the issuing authority are also not mentioned in the show-cause...

  12. Compulsory scrutiny - AO Jurisdiction and authority to take up the case for compulsory scrutiny - Since the conditions as prescribed in Clause D of para 3 of the...

  13. The court held that the notices issued u/s 133(6) and the subsequent notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act were invalid. The petitioner had filed a reply to the notice...

  14. The ITAT held that the limitation period for issuing a notice u/s 143(2) is relevant to the financial year and assessment year. When the Assessing Officer considered the...

  15. Rectification u/s 154 - non deduction of TDS u/s 194I - The Tribunal examined the rectification proceedings and found that the Assessing Officer's actions were not...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates