Imposition of penalty - exporter of alleged goods - psychotropic ...

Customs

October 3, 2019

Imposition of penalty - exporter of alleged goods - psychotropic substance - The movement of goods for export is through courier firms but nowhere the clearance of goods exported were doubted even though the export goods are subjected to testing and examination and especially in case of drugs. - only on the basis of statements, it cannot be concluded that the Appellant had exported 165 Kgs of Ketmaine HCL.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Imposition of penalty - exporter of alleged goods - psychotropic ...

Customs

October 3, 2019

You may also like:

Imposition of penalty u/s 53 (12) - movement of goods in the disguise of movement in the course of export to avoid tax liability - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Conviction u/s 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, Act, 1985 - smuggling - Evidence of this case is sufficient to prove the guilt of the accused beyond...

Imposition of penalty - Mis-declaration of imported goods - Smuggling - penalty cannot be imposed both on the proprietor as well as the firm.

CE - imposition of penalties one on the proprietorship firm and second on the proprietor would amount to imposition of penalty twice, which cannot be sustained in the eyes of law

Seeking grant of bail - Smuggling - psychotropic substances - admissibility of confessional statement recorded under Section 67 of the NDPS Act - In the absence of any...

Difference in weighment of export goods - Advance license scheme - appreciating the fact that such difference was only 10%, there is no justification for the...

Penalty on CHA - in the absence of any evidence to show that there was active involvement of the appellant in concealment of controlled substance in its export...

Imposition of penalty on partners - penalty on partner is not imposable when the firm is penalised under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002.

Imposition of Simultaneous Penalties - Whether CESTAT erred in imposing simultaneous penalties on both the Partner and Partnership firm – Matter referred to larger bench - HC

Imposition of penalty - Advertisement Agency Service - non-payment of Service tax - Section 78 - when the first SCN was issued, the subsequent SCN cannot allege...

Quick Updates: