Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights October 2019 Year 2019 This

Imposition of penalty - exporter of alleged goods - psychotropic ...


Exporter Penalized for Alleged Ketamine Export; Conclusion Based on Statements Lacks Substantive Evidence.

October 3, 2019

Case Laws     Customs     AT

Imposition of penalty - exporter of alleged goods - psychotropic substance - The movement of goods for export is through courier firms but nowhere the clearance of goods exported were doubted even though the export goods are subjected to testing and examination and especially in case of drugs. - only on the basis of statements, it cannot be concluded that the Appellant had exported 165 Kgs of Ketmaine HCL.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The appellants, who were neither exporters nor Customs House Agents (CHAs), were wrongly penalized u/ss 114 and 114AA for overvaluation of goods for claiming excess duty...

  2. Addition made u/s 69C of the Income Tax Act for alleged cash payments based on a WhatsApp message and statement of a third party. The key points are: The WhatsApp...

  3. Levy of penalty u/s 114 of the Customs Act - appellant is a freight forwarder - export of non-basmati rice - prohibited goods or not - admittedly in the course of...

  4. Cenvat Credit - Export to Nepal - if such exporters are allowed to utilize the credit availed on the inputs exported under Bond to Nepal this would result into a...

  5. The Advance Ruling Authority in Tamil Nadu addressed the liability of an exporter (M/s. DCW Ltd.) under Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) to pay GST on export freight on...

  6. The appellant, HAIL, was engaged in slaughtering animals and exporting meat during the relevant period. It availed the benefit of the VKGUY scheme, which provides...

  7. Revocation of customs broker license and levy of penalty found unjustified. Alleged violations of Regulations 10(a), 10(b), 10(d) & 10(n) of CBLR, 2018 regarding...

  8. The case pertains to a duty drawback claim where the exporter (appellant) allegedly misdeclared the export goods, leading to an excess drawback claim of Rs 20,394/-. The...

  9. Illegal export - it is alleged that respondent (Inspector of customs) had connived with the exporters for helping them obtain certificate of export without actual export...

  10. Refund of service tax paid - export - Once it is not in dispute that the services are specified for refund purpose, and since Service Tax was actually paid on specified...

  11. Revocation of Customs Broker License - irrespective of the appellants not informing the Customs about the non production of export goods, the above independent system of...

  12. Revocation of Customs Broker License - export of cut and polished diamonds - alleged misuse of several persons to secure importer exporter code (IEC) numbers - As the...

  13. This case pertains to penalties imposed for alleged violation of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA), 1973. The respondent claimed the appellant transferred...

  14. The trade notice informs about an upcoming mechanism for refund of IGST on exports through post. Exporters will provide details for seeking IGST refund while filing...

  15. The CESTAT Allahabad held that in a case involving illegal exports of non-basmati rice to Nepal, there was a lack of evidence to prove the illegal export. The tribunal...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates