Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights August 2012 Year 2012 This

Demand – personal penalty – penalty is sought to be imposed not ...


Penalty Ruling: Firm Liable, Partners Exempt from Penalties in Joint Cases.

August 27, 2012

Case Laws     Central Excise     AT

Demand – personal penalty – penalty is sought to be imposed not only on the firm but also on the partners which is clearly not permissible- AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Imposition of penalty on partners - penalty on partner is not imposable when the firm is penalised under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002.

  2. Imposition of personal penalty on the Partner of the Firm in terms of Section 78A of the Finance Act, 1994 - The case involved the imposition of a personal penalty on...

  3. Demanding duty from the firm and penalties were imposed on the firm & partner both - The appeal filed by the firm cannot be considered as joint appeal - AT

  4. In a case under Section 138 of the N.I. Act against partners of a firm, the HC held that compounding of the offense by one partner discharges the entire liability of the...

  5. The key holdings were: 1) Since the goods (areca nuts) were absolutely confiscated, the demand for duty on the appellants is unsustainable. 2) Penalty u/s 114A of the...

  6. Penalty u/s 112 - since penalty has been imposed on partnership firm under Section 112 (a), separate penalty on its partner would not be justified - AT

  7. Levy of penalty - Applicability of the substituted rule for imposition of penalty - The Supreme Court sided with the appellant, holding that the substituted rule from...

  8. Penalty u/s 271C – reasonable cause - The assessees are partners in a firm – Both the assessees has paid interest to firm without deducting tax at source - No penalty - AT

  9. Penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - Contravention of Rule 8(3A) - penalty under Rule 25 is not permissible, but penalty under Rule 27 is to be imposed - AT

  10. Levy of penalty u/r 26 - Personal penalty for abatement in evasion of duty - a plain reading of Rule 26 indicates that imposition of the penalty therein is not tied to a...

  11. Levy of penalty on Proprietor of the Firm under Rule 26(2) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 - fraudulent availment of CENVAT Credit - Taking note of the fact that penalty...

  12. Penalty u/r 26 of CER - Clandestine removal - Once the penalty was imposed on a partnership firm, no separate penalty should be imposed on the partners separately for...

  13. Imposition of penalties on partners of manufacturing firm u/r 26 of CER - non-payment of Central Excise duty by the partnership firm, M/s Allied Electricals - It is not...

  14. Levy of simultaneous penalties on both the Partner and Partnership firm in adjudication proceedings under the Customs Act. - Penalty for abeting - Simultaneous...

  15. CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, considered a case involving penalty u/s 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 on a co-noticee who is a Partner in a Customs Broker firm for...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates