Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights October 2019 Year 2019 This

Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - It is manifest that only ...


Income Tax Commissioner Can Revise Orders u/s 264: No Time Limit for Assessee Applications, One-Year Limit Suo-Motu.

October 30, 2019

Case Laws     Income Tax     HC

Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - It is manifest that only suo-motu power of the Commissioner under Section 264 of the IT Act, is restricted against an order passed within one year, whereas no such restriction is imposed on the Commissioner to exercise his power in respect of an order, which has been passed more than on year, if such revisional power is sought to be invoked at the instance of the Assessee by making an application under Section 264 of the IT Act.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Condonation of delay - revision u/s 264 - as the order u/s 143(1) came to be passed within this one year itself, writ petitioner had taken the first step to have income...

  2. The petitioner incurred expenditure towards application of income as required u/s 11(1)(d) for the year under consideration, which was evident from the computation of...

  3. The case pertains to the jurisdiction of impugned orders under the U.P.G.S.T. Act, 2017, and the time limitation u/s 73 and Section 44 of the Act. The key points are:...

  4. The assessee's request for fixation of special rate of brand-rate drawback was rejected due to non-fulfilment of basic requirements and time limitation. The assessee...

  5. CENVAT Credit - time limitation - entitlement for Credit beyond six month - since the time limit has been extended from six months to one year by substitution in the...

  6. The ITAT held that the AO, after examining the assessee's explanation, was prima facie satisfied with the correctness of the suo motu disallowance made by the assessee...

  7. The High Court held that the petitioner, a Director in the Government of Meghalaya's Department of Soil, who claimed exemption from income tax u/s 10(26) as a member of...

  8. Substitution of new section for section 153- Time limit for completion of assessment, reassessment and recomputation. - the period for completion of fresh assessment in...

  9. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the final assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) u/s 144C(4) read with Section 147 of the Income Tax...

  10. Revision u/s 264 - Period of limitation - an order under Section 264 is required to be passed within a period of one year from the end of Financial Year, in which, the...

  11. Cenvat credit – suo motu credit on the amount paid by assessee erroneously earlier – suo motu credit availed by the appellant is inadmissible to them - AT

  12. Revision Petition filed u/s 264 of the order passed by AO u/s 270AA(4) - The provision does not provide for any bar or prohibition against the assessee challenging an...

  13. Section 264 empowers Commissioner to revise assessment order to provide relief to assessee in cases of over-assessment, even if assessee did not file revised return....

  14. Time limit to pass assessment u/s. 92CA(3) - Transfer pricing adjustments - After thorough consideration of the statutory provisions and legal arguments presented by...

  15. Limit limit to pass order u/s. 201(1)/201(1A) - default for non-deduction of tax at source (TDS) - A subsequent amendment to the provision cannot give a new lease of...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates