Service of order - Relevant date for communication of order - ...

Appellant Proves No Delay in Filing Appeal Due to Lack of Proper Order Communication by Commissioner (Appeals.

December 4, 2019

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Service of order - Relevant date for communication of order - Period of limitation for filing an appeal - the appellant could able to demonstrate and rebut the presumption that the order dated 29.08.2017 could not have been delivered to them through the speed post dated 01.09.2017 and in fact they have not been communicated about the said Order on 12.9.2017 as held by the Ld. Commissioner(Appeals). - there is no delay in filing the appeal.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Service of order - Relevant date for communication of order - ...

Appellant Proves No Delay in Filing Appeal Due to Lack of Proper Order Communication by Commissioner (Appeals.

December 4, 2019

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Condonation of delay - substantial delay of 166 days before ITAT - The appellant argued that the delay in filing the appeal before the ITAT was due to the absence of...

The High Court refused to condone the delay of 4486 days in filing an appeal against a money recovery decree. The delay was inordinate, and the appellant, a limited...

Condonation of delay - Delay in filling of an appeal before ITAT - The ITAT observed taht the appeal was delayed by 17 days. The assessee claimed the delay was due to...

Seeking condonation delay of 41 days in filing the present appeal - Sufficient reasons for delay or not - initiation of CIRP - Despite the appellant's claim of lack of...

Condonation of delay in filing appeal - Or the appeal was filed within the time - Once the appellant had indicated in ST-IV form that the order was received by the...

Appellant proved ownership of gold bars through valid invoices, discharging initial onus. Revenue failed to establish invoices unrelated to seized gold, lacking inquiry...

Delay of 1190 days in filing appeal against order u/s 143(1) was condoned. Appellant filed rectification petition u/s 154 against order u/s 143(1) which was pending...

ITAT ought to have condoned 53 days' delay in preferring appeal as appellant explained delay occurred due to wrong advice of counsel to reapply for registration u/s 12A,...

Condonation of delay in filling appeal before CIT(A) - CIT(A) dismissing the appeal of the assessee in-limine - The Appellate Tribunal recognized the appellant's...

Fixation of IRP fees - lack of earnestness and proficiency on the part of the IRP - The Appellate Tribunal finds that the IRP's fees were initially quoted at a higher...

Seeking to Condone Delay of 14 days in filing the Appeal - Sufficient cause for delay or not - Even if the Appellant's argument regarding the delay in accessing the...

Condonation of delay - delay of 280 days - sufficient cause - The Tribunal noted that the delay was due to the callous and lackadaisical approach of the appellant in not...

Delay in filing appeal - Period of limitation - There are no delay in filing of the application and as Counsel for the Appellant has submitted that the Application for...

HC rejected challenge to adjudication order denying ITC. Appellant, purchaser, argued valid tax invoice and taxes paid; if supplier's registration cancelled, ITC denial...

Smuggling - Betel Nuts - foreign origin goods - town seizure - notified item or not - onus to prove - The CESTAT recognized that betel nuts were not notified items under...

Quick Updates: