Non-speaking order - Refund of the differential duty - by not ...

Officer Ordered to Issue Speaking Orders After Failing to Respond to Reassessment Challenges for Differential Duty Refunds.

January 7, 2020

Case Laws Customs AT

Non-speaking order - Refund of the differential duty - by not issuing the speaking orders or giving any reply to their requests for speaking order, the officer has denied the appellant their legitimate right to challenge the reassessments. - The assessing officer are directed to issue speaking orders.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Non-speaking order - Refund of the differential duty - by not ...

Officer Ordered to Issue Speaking Orders After Failing to Respond to Reassessment Challenges for Differential Duty Refunds.

January 7, 2020

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Revision u/s 263 - merger of the order - the entire issue of limited scrutiny, reasons for selection, the Bank accounts in questions were before the ld. Pr. CIT. On this...

NCLAT dismissed the appeal challenging a procedural order related to a company petition. The tribunal held that the impugned order did not dilute any party's rights and...

Issue of reassessment u/s 263, where the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) upheld the reassessment as erroneous and prejudicial to the Revenue's interest for verification...

Validity of order passed u/ss 154/147/143(3) - Disallowance of prior period expenses - Relevant previous year being first year of assessee's business, no prior period...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Earlier, ITAT remanded the matter back requesting the AO to provide reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings. - AO must have...

The High Court quashed the reassessment proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, holding it to be a case of "change of opinion" and...

HC allowed the petition challenging an impugned tax order, finding procedural irregularities in the original decision. The court determined that the order dated...

The High Court addressed a challenge to three separate orders, alleging a breach of natural justice principles. The petitioner responded to discrepancies during...

CIT invoked revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 alleging AO did not examine provision for subcontracting expenses and refund claim during reassessment proceedings. Assessee...

The High Court found the order passed by the authority to be violative of principles of natural justice as it was a non-speaking order that failed to address the...

HC allowed the petition challenging GST registration cancellation, finding the impugned order non-compliant with procedural requirements. The order was deemed arbitrary...

The High Court quashed the reassessment order due to procedural defects. The Assessing Officer failed to dispose of the assessee's objections through a speaking order...

Validity of reassessment order u/s 147 - order was not uploaded online - Procedure followed by the revenue in time barring assessments is that while the order may not be...

Non-speaking order - It is clear that the order of Tribunal is certainly a non-speaking order and the Tribunal failed to consider the grounds raised by the appellant....

Appellants' right to challenge the enhancement of declared values for imported goods, even after initially requesting expedited clearance. The key points are: Section 17...

Quick Updates: