Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Indian Laws - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights February 2020 Year 2020 This

Dishonor of Cheque - Non-compliance with the mandatory ...


Cheque Dishonor Case: Section 202(1) Non-Compliance Doesn't Quash Proceedings, Highlights Procedural Lapse in Section 204 Process.

February 17, 2020

Case Laws     Indian Laws     HC

Dishonor of Cheque - Non-compliance with the mandatory provisions as contained in Section 202(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure cannot be considered to be a ground for quashing the proceedings pending against the petitioners. However, at the same time it cannot be ignored that the process under Section 204 Cr.P.C. was issued without taking care of that provisions.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non-compliance of notice issues - if the quantum proceedings itself are declared to be bad in law and quashed , then any non compliance on the...

  2. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that every non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) gives a separate cause of action for levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b)....

  3. Dishonor of Cheque - When a cheque is issued even though as ‘security’ the consequence flowing therefrom is also known to the drawer of the cheque and in the...

  4. HC ruled penalty proceedings under sections 271D and 271E require explicit satisfaction to be recorded by Assessing Officer during reassessment. Mere recording of...

  5. Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - Non-compliance with a notice issued u/s 142(1) - The Tribunal noted that in a previous round of proceedings, a penalty under section 271(1)(b) of...

  6. Dishonor of Cheque - prosecution against the person who signed the cheque or the person who has authorized the signatory - The law on the point is made very clear. When...

  7. Dishonor of Cheque - existence of enforceable debt or not - evidently, the cheque in question was given as ‘security’ and not in respect of any ‘enforceable debt’, which...

  8. The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving the levy of penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) due to the Accountant's Covid-19...

  9. Dishonor of Cheque - when a cheque has been issued as a security, the consequences flowing therefrom is also known to the drawer of the cheque, and in the circumstances,...

  10. This case pertains to the dishonor of cheques and the challenge to cognizance and summoning orders. The key points are: The cheques were signed and issued by respondent...

  11. Dishonor of Cheque - Different cheques, may be issued for discharging the liability, arising out of one and same transaction, are separate entities and dishonour of each...

  12. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal deleted the penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) for non-compliance with a notice issued u/s 142(1) during reassessment proceedings....

  13. Dishonour of Cheque - Funds Insufficient - Signatory of Cheques - vicarious liability of Directors - If the plea of petitioners is accepted that since they were not a...

  14. The HC dismissed the petitions seeking quashing of criminal complaints against the petitioners for dishonor of cheques. It held that exercising inherent jurisdiction u/s...

  15. The case involves penalty imposition u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with statutory notices issued u/ss 143(2) and 142(1). Assessee explained non-compliance due to a...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates