Imposition of penalty u/s 114AA of Customs Act, 1962 on ...

No Evidence Found: Customs House Agent Avoids Penalty u/s 114AA for Alleged Cosmetic Export Rule Violation.

February 24, 2020

Case Laws Customs AT

Imposition of penalty u/s 114AA of Customs Act, 1962 on appellant-CHA - apparently, there is no material evidence available on records to prove that the appellants intentionally encouraged and supported the wrong doer i.e. the importer in doing the wrongful act of attempting to export the branded cosmetic goods in violation of Cosmetic Rules, 2010. - No penalty - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Imposition of penalty u/s 114AA of Customs Act, 1962 on ...

No Evidence Found: Customs House Agent Avoids Penalty u/s 114AA for Alleged Cosmetic Export Rule Violation.

February 24, 2020

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Imposition of penalties u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act 1962 on Customs broker - import of used Multifunction Digital Photocopiers and Printers - it is alleged that the...

Levy of penalty on Customs Broker under Section 132 read with Section 117 of the Customs Act, 1962 - a Customs House Agent or a Customs Broker cannot be fastened with...

CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, considered a case involving penalty u/s 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 on a co-noticee who is a Partner in a Customs Broker firm for...

CESTAT analyzed a case involving a Customs House Agent (CHA) facing penalties under Sections 114(iii) and 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962. The tribunal found the...

CESTAT adjudicated a case involving alleged submission of false export documents. The tribunal found insufficient evidence to substantiate charges of abetment or...

Enhancement of penalty, levied on Employee of CHA - appellant was reckless and negligent in using the Customs House Agent Licence of his Employer. - Smuggling - red...

Revocation of Customs Broker License - Manipulation of import invoices or valuation of goods - Once a violation of CBLR Regulations is admitted, the Revenue has to...

CESTAT ruled in favor of delivery agents, setting aside penalties u/ss 112(a) and 114AA of Customs Act, 1962. The agents, who handled a sealed FCL container from Jebel...

Levy of penalty u/s 112 (a) of the Customs Act 1962 - Customs House Agent (CHA) - violation of Regulation 13 of CHALR 2004 - It is alleged that the appellant did not...

The appellants, who were neither exporters nor Customs House Agents (CHAs), were wrongly penalized u/ss 114 and 114AA for overvaluation of goods for claiming excess duty...

Demand of customs duty based on mis-declaration of weight of imported rough A marble blocks - The Tribunal observed that, it is found that the department established a...

Levy of penalty u/s 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 - Smuggling - Red Sanders - appellant have not made, signed or use any declaration, statement or document pertaining...

Customs Brloker - Penalty u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 and Section 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 - misdeclaration of imported consignment - clearance of cosmetic...

The CESTAT held that the expression 'liable to penalty' u/s 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 means that a person who knowingly makes a false declaration may be penalised,...

The penalty imposed u/s 114(i) of the Customs Act, 1962 on the appellant (a Customs Broker) for abetting the clearance of undeclared/mis-declared export goods was...

Quick Updates: