Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights March 2020 Year 2020 This

Valuation - inclusion of additional amount which has been ...


Appellant Must Pay Excise Duty on Retained Amounts Collected as VAT from Customers, Deemed Additional Sale Consideration.

March 5, 2020

Case Laws     Central Excise     AT

Valuation - inclusion of additional amount which has been collected by the appellant from their customers as representing VAT but which has not been deposited as VAT forms an additional consideration for sale, in the assessable value - Excise Duty has to be paid on such amounts which are retained by the assessee. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The appellant paid excise duty on the removal of inputs as such, based on the transaction value. However, this excise duty was found to be in excess of the actual CENVAT...

  2. Interpretation of Section 11D of the Central Excise Act, 1944, regarding the recovery of amounts collected as excise duty but not deposited with the government. The key...

  3. Valuation - turnover for the purpose of VAT - Inclusion of excise duty in invoice amount - Assessee not collected excise amount from customers - no addition - HC

  4. Duty evasion - Whether or not the appellant collected in the name of excise duty any amount from their buyers which they failed to deposit to the Government - appellant...

  5. Refund of Excise duty paid under protest - it was obligatory on the part of Central Excise Officer to have issued a notice to the appellant for payment of the short paid...

  6. Nature of Duty Paid by 100% Export Oriented Units (EOU) - The CESTAT held that while the measure adopted for computing duty paid by 100% EOUs may be based on customs...

  7. Demand of Central Excise duty under Section 11D of CEA - Reversal of Cenvat Credit - Needless to say, since this is not an amount of excise paid by the appellant and the...

  8. Appellant established that incidence of duty was not passed on to customers. Refund sanctioning authority's report confirmed duty was not mentioned on invoices issued to...

  9. CESTAT determined that sales tax/VAT amounts retained by appellant under state government's deferment scheme must be included in transaction value for computing central...

  10. As appellants were not exigible to tax during relevant period, appellants cannot be permitted to retain amount collected by them from their customers as that would...

  11. Refund claim - excise duty paid wrongly - The entry was made debiting the excise duty without actually collecting the excise duty - they have not paid the excise duty...

  12. Refund of wrongly paid Central Excise Duty on Retail Sale Price (Maximum Retail Price-MRP) - unjust enrichment - The authorities concluded that the appellant had passed...

  13. Valuation - inclusion of subsidy - Under the promotion policy involved in these appeals, the subsidy does not reduce the sales tax that is required to be paid by the...

  14. Valuation - Short payment of excise duty - appellant had acted under bona fide belief that VAT amount collected by them from the customers and retained was not...

  15. Evasion of service tax - allegation that Appellant have collected the service tax from the customers but not paid it to Department - In the present matter revenue in...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates