Refund of Excise Duty - doctrine of merger - time limitation - ...

Excise Duty Refund Case: Tribunal Pending Appeal Stops Refund Application, Limitation Period Not Applicable.

March 9, 2020

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Refund of Excise Duty - doctrine of merger - time limitation - since upon the Revenue preferring an appeal against the Order-in-Appeal (with the assessee also filing its cross-objection), the matter was sub judice before the Tribunal and naturally, when the matter was lis pendens, no such application for refund could be filed. - The appellant’s claim for refund is not hit by limitation - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund of Excise Duty - doctrine of merger - time limitation - ...

Excise Duty Refund Case: Tribunal Pending Appeal Stops Refund Application, Limitation Period Not Applicable.

March 9, 2020

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Refund claim for amount deposited in PLA, whether duty or not, subject to time limitation u/s 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944. Held that Apex court in Modipon Ltd. case...

Power to issue SCN - Recovery of erroneous refund with interest - It is more than apparent that section 11A of the Excise Act cannot be resorted to by the Department for...

The petitioner filed a refund application within the two-year limitation period for the year 2017-2018 on 17.09.2018, and subsequently filed a fresh refund application...

The case concerns the time limit for filing a refund claim of Special Additional Duty (SAD) paid by an importer. The issue is whether the one-year limitation specified...

Refund of excise duty paid erroneously - When the appellant realized that he has paid excess duty thereafter he filed the refund application under Section 11B of the...

The appellant sought refund of Countervailing Duty (CVD) and Special Additional Duty (SAD) paid in cash u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Section 142(3)...

Refund of Additional Duty of Customs paid - to allow the limitation period to start from the date of payment of duty as prescribed under the amended notification, would...

The case involved a dispute over a refund claim u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act. The Appellate Tribunal held that the time limitation for filing the refund claim did...

Rejection of the refund application - rejection on the ground of time limitation - Defective refund application - The High Court held that, even assuming that the...

100% EOU - de-bonding - refund of the excise duty previously paid - Admittedly, such duty was paid at the time of what is referred to de-bonding. However, this would not...

Refund of central excise duty claimed by the buyer - duty was paid under protest - applicability of time limitation - The scheme of Section 11B makes a distinction...

Recovery of wrongly utilized credit - utilization of Cenvat Credit availed on Basic Excise Duty (BED) for payment of EC and SHEC - Period between April 2013 and January...

Refund of accumulated input tax credit - relevant date for the purpose of considering the limitation u/s 54 - The High Court addressed this issue by directing the...

Refund claim - excise duty paid wrongly - The entry was made debiting the excise duty without actually collecting the excise duty - they have not paid the excise duty...

ITAT determined that excise duty refund received under Notification No.39/2001 Central Excise, issued as part of earthquake relief incentive scheme for Kutch District,...

Quick Updates: