Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights March 2020 Year 2020 This

Penalty u/s 271E - violation of the provision of section 269T - ...


No Penalty Imposed for Technical Breach of Section 269T as Assessee Proves Genuine Transactions u/s 271E.

March 20, 2020

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Penalty u/s 271E - violation of the provision of section 269T - assessee has repaid the loans and advances received from various creditors otherwise than by crossed cheque - sufficient and reasonable cause for repayment of the loan to the directors and shareholders - the assessee has demonstrated that transactions were genuine with relevant documents. It is a mere technical violation and there is no loss to the revenue - No penalty - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The case pertains to penalty proceedings u/s 271D for violating Section 269SS and Section 271E of the Income Tax Act. The assessee received Rs. 18 lakh from a trustee...

  2. Penalty u/s 271E - repayment in cash - The purpose of introduction of the penal provisions in the legislature were to curb black money and benami transactions. The...

  3. Penalty u/s 271D or 271E - Penalty u/s.271D or 271E of the Act is concerned, those are independent proceedings and having nothing to do with assessment proceedings or...

  4. Deletion of LTCG as non-genuine - transactions in shares - Deletion of undisclosed commission paid for arranging accommodation entries - assessee proves that...

  5. Assessee made repayments of loans/deposits through modes other than account payee cheques/drafts, violating Section 269T. Penalty u/s 271E was imposed. ITAT bifurcated...

  6. Penalty u/s 271E - contravention of Section 269T - repayment by journal entries - penalty imposed u/s 271E deserves to be deleted - HC

  7. Levy of penalties under various sections - The Appellate Tribunal, in a consolidated order, addressed several appeals concerning penalties imposed under various sections...

  8. Levy of Penalty u/s 112 - Scope of the show cause notice - The CESTAT noted that, no show cause notice has been issued proposing the demand of differential duty or the...

  9. Entitlement to Input Tax Credit - suppression of turnover or not - Bogus dealer - genuine purchase or not - There cannot be any dispute as to the burden cast on the...

  10. Penalty levied u/s 271FA for delay in filing Statement of Financial Transactions (SFT) was challenged. The assessee delayed 255 days in complying with Section 285BA,...

  11. Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

  12. The assessee failed to discharge its initial onus to prove creditworthiness and genuineness of the transaction reflecting a sum as outstanding in its final books of...

  13. Levy of maximum penalty - penalty imposed on the basis of technical error - non downloading of E-way Bill-01 - The Allahabad High Court reviewed the matter and set aside...

  14. The case involved a challenge to penalty orders u/ss 271D and 271E before the Appellate Tribunal. The issue revolved around the reassessment proceedings being quashed,...

  15. Alleged fraudulent transactions and non-genuine losses claimed by the assessee in currency option trades on the United Stock Exchange (USE). The key points are: The...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates