Rectification u/s 254 - A mistake which is apparent from the ...

High Court Overturns ITAT's Order; Examines Error u/s 254 for Overlooked Co-ordinate Bench Decision.

March 20, 2020

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Rectification u/s 254 - A mistake which is apparent from the record or not - non-consideration of an issue by the ITAT - As already pointed out above, there was no averment in the miscellaneous application by the respondent / assessee that it had pointed out or argued the Co-ordinate Bench decision relating to the block assessment during hearing of the appeal and that the Tribunal did not consider the same. - All that the Tribunal had done was to restore the matter to the file of the assessing officer for a fresh decision in accordance with law in which the respondent / assessee would have ample opportunity to place all the materials at its command before the assessing officer for consideration. - Order of ITAT set aside - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Rectification u/s 254 - A mistake which is apparent from the ...

High Court Overturns ITAT's Order; Examines Error u/s 254 for Overlooked Co-ordinate Bench Decision.

March 20, 2020

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Rectification application u/s 254 - Tribunal not followed the decision on the identical facts by the Coordinate Bench which is confirmed by this Court - The Court...

Rectification u/s 254 - non consideration of Tribunal decision in order which was referred and provided in paper book - an apparent error requiring necessary...

The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the appellant and set aside the impugned order disallowing CENVAT credit taken on input services used in BTS (Base Transceiver...

Binding Judgement of Lager Bench / Majority decision - strength of the Bench - In view of Article 145(5) of the Constitution of India concurrence of a majority of the...

Rectification u/s 254 - non consideration of admission of additional evidence - Bench has to evaluate the admissibility of the additional evidence and then, it has to...

Rectification of mistake u/s 254 - failure to consider an argument advanced by either party for arriving at a conclusion is not an error apparent on the record, although...

Rectification u/s 254 - error apparent on face of record - non-disposal of specific ground raised in the grounds of appeal is an error within the meaning of 254(2) -...

Rectification u/s 254 - violation of the provisions of section 255(3) - appeal heard by a Single Member Bench instead of Division Bench - since the income assessed in...

ITAT recalled its earlier order due to discovery of inadvertent errors, specifically the reliance on non-existing case laws identified during suo-moto review. Exercising...

Rectification u/s 254 - Tribunal has referred to certain decisions without giving opportunity of being heard - assessee was not given an opportunity to explain his case...

The HC held that the Tribunal erred in exercising jurisdiction u/s 254(2) to set aside the additions made by the AO regarding delayed payment of statutory dues like PF...

Rectification u/s 254 - the assessee would be entitled to claim deduction u/s. 10A for the unexpired period even if it relates to IQF with regard to processing of...

Legality of revision of order of Tribunal u/s 254 on ground of retrospective overruling - Judicial decision acts retrospectively. Judges do not make law they only...

Supremacy of decision division bench of a non-jurisdictional High Court and a single judge bench of a non-jurisdictional High Court - judicial hierarchy - Applicability...

Maintainability of appeal before tribunal - Seizure of goods - Section 110(A) - Two member bench disagrees with the decision of larger bench - matter referred to the...

Quick Updates: