Revision u/s 263 - The type, nature and extent of investigation ...

Income Tax

June 26, 2020

Revision u/s 263 - The type, nature and extent of investigation is the prerogative of the Assessing Officer. Pr. CIT, cannot, in our view, invoke his power u/s 263 for revising an order passed u/s 143(3) of the Act for the reason that in his view, the investigation/enquiry should be conducted in a particular manner or to a particular extent. Inadequate enquiry cannot be a ground of revision.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 - The type, nature and extent of investigation ...

Income Tax

June 26, 2020

You may also like:

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - an order which is prejudicial to the interests of the revenue - As far as adequacy of inquiry is considered, there is no law which provides the...

Revision u/s 263 - CIT has merely directed the Assessing Officer to make an elaborate inquiry. - revision is not valid - AT

Revision u/s 263 – IT was not justified in setting aside the order and directing for investigating the facts afresh without pointing out any specific fact which required...

Revision u/s 263 - correct head of income - while we see no reason to interfere with the order of the Commissioner under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act to the extent...

Revision u/s 263 - Explanation 2 to section 263 (Deeming erroneous order) is applicable only when there is no enquiry made by the Assessing Officer.

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Addition u/s 68 - the transaction has never been examined by the assessing officer. No enquiry has been conducted relating to the alleged sum....

Revision u/s 263 - assessment order passed u/s 153A r.w.s 143(3) - no any incriminating material unearthed by search team therefore Assessing Officer’s order is not erroneous.

Revision u/sec. 263 - CIT has exceeded his jurisdiction in directing the Assessing Officer to initiate penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - AT

Revision u/s 263 - unaccounted interest payments - the Commissioner of Income Tax cannot find fault and he cannot impose his view on the Assessing Officer - AT

Revision u/s 263 - entire materials on record were not considered by the Assessing Officer - It would have definitely be an erroneous procedure adopted by the AO - HC

Quick Updates: