Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights August 2020 Year 2020 This

Assessment u/s 158BC - Unexplained investment - Tribunal further ...


High Court Criticizes Tribunal's Decision on Unexplained Investment u/s 158BC for Lack of Evidence and Erroneous Assumptions.

August 6, 2020

Case Laws     Income Tax     HC

Assessment u/s 158BC - Unexplained investment - Tribunal further has erroneously and perversely held that as question was not asked to the assessee, the assessee cannot be faulted for not furnishing the details and the person to whom the land was sold and only because the assessee was a broker and he was not expected to make investment of his money. It appears that such findings are arrived at by the Tribunal only on the basis of the presumption and assumption - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The Appellate Tribunal considered the legality of additions based on a diary seized from a third party. The Tribunal held that the presumption u/s 132(4A) of the Act...

  2. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Addition u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act for share application money received from various individuals. The company failed to prove the...

  3. The Appellate Tribunal considered several issues: 1. Addition against undisclosed income from bank accounts. Assessee's funds routed through bank accounts of others....

  4. The Appellate Tribunal addressed the addition u/s 69 concerning unexplained investment. The issue stemmed from an agreement displaying the individual name of the...

  5. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowances in the quantum assessment order - whether any concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars proved? - Tribunal directs...

  6. Unexplained investment u/s 69 - The tribunal closely examined the additions made under Section 69 related to unexplained investments in stock. The assessees argued that...

  7. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the reopening of assessment u/s 147 due to the assessee providing bogus accommodation loss entries. The AO had reasons to believe in the...

  8. The ITAT Mumbai held that addition as unexplained income based on accommodation entries lacked proof of transaction nature, creditworthiness, and genuineness. AO's...

  9. The ITAT Jodhpur allowed admission of additional evidence u/r 46A of IT Rules by CIT(A) to delete addition on merits. The tribunal found merit in the evidence provided...

  10. Assessment u/s 153C - Undisclosed investment u/s 69 r.w.s 115BBE - Whether incriminating material belonging to Assessee found during the course of search on the basis of...

  11. The Appellate Tribunal considered various issues. Firstly, on disallowance u/s. 14A r.w. Rule 8D(ii), it was held that no disallowance of interest expenditure was...

  12. Undervaluation of imported goods - Patchouli Oil - The CESTAT found that the rejection of the declared value lacked legal basis and was unsupported by evidence. The...

  13. The case pertains to an addition made u/s 69 for unexplained investment in agricultural land at Ratlam. The issue revolved around whether the addition was based on...

  14. Additions against Over-invoicing of Purchases - The Tribunal found that the AO's selective reliance on pieces of evidence without considering the entirety of the...

  15. Addition u/s 69 - Unexplained investment or not - only when the investment is not recorded in the books of accounts or the explanation by the assessee regarding the...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates