Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
GST - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights August 2020 Year 2020 This

Recovery of GST - Non filing of returns - there is a caveat in ...


GST Recovery Notices Deemed Inappropriate After Returns Filed Within Allowed Period u/s 62(2.

August 28, 2020

Case Laws     GST     HC

Recovery of GST - Non filing of returns - there is a caveat in terms of provision u/s 62(2) where on receipt of such information, as noticed above, was received by the petitioner on 27.9 2019, petitioner filed the returns on 25.10.2019 within 30 days. There could not have been an occasion for issuing of recovery notices as assessment orders were in law required be withdrawn. - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Seeking withdrawal of best judgment assessment orders passed - return filed within (granted extended) time or not - If that were to be so, though the period of 30 days...

  2. Best judgement assessment - GSTR returns were not filed by the petitioner within the prescribed time limit - At any cost, the right to file the returns cannot be taken...

  3. HC held that the 60-day period under Section 62(2) of GST Act is directory, not mandatory. The petitioner failed to file returns for October 2018 to March 2019 within...

  4. The HC ruled that the 60-day limitation period under Section 62(2) of the GST Act for filing returns after a best judgment assessment is directory rather than mandatory....

  5. Best Judgement Assessment under GST - failure to file returns within time - This Court may not be justified in granting an extension of the period contemplated u/s...

  6. HC condoned the delay in filing GST returns beyond the 30-day period specified in Section 62(2) of the GST Act, 2017, following the precedent established in Comfort Shoe...

  7. Condonation of delay in filing returns - due to ill-health, returns (GSTR-3B) could not be filed within the time prescribed by the second respondent - The petitioner,...

  8. The HC held that the 60-day limitation period under Section 62(2) of the GST Act is directory rather than mandatory. Where a registered person fails to file returns...

  9. Reopening of assessment u/s 147- non-issue of notice u/s. 143(2) - Non filing of ITR within thirty days after issue of notice u/s. 148 - though the assessee did not file...

  10. Notice u/s 143(2) - period of limitation - defective return filed u/s 139(1) - upon such defects being removed, the return would relate back to the date of filing of the...

  11. Limitation Period for issuance of notice u/s 143(2) - Scrutiny Assessment - Relevant date - after filing of the return of income, defect notice u/s 139(9) had been sent...

  12. Validity of assessment orders passed pursuant to a best judgment assessment - Section 62 of the GST Act - Default in filing of returns - pray for filing of belated...

  13. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - When the A.O. admits in the notice under section 142(1) Dated 20.10.2014 that assessee filed return of income under section 148 of the...

  14. Proviso to sub-rule (4) of Rule 22 of CGST Rules 2017 allows revocation of GST registration cancellation u/s 29(2)(c) of CGST Act 2017 if pending returns are filed and...

  15. The ITAT held that the limitation period for issuing a notice u/s 143(2) is relevant to the financial year and assessment year. When the Assessing Officer considered the...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates