Transfer Pricing Adjustment - adjustment against AMP expenditure ...

Transfer Pricing Officer's Bright Line Test Invalidated in AMP Expenditure Case; Lacks Explicit Assessee-AE Arrangement.

September 10, 2020

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Transfer Pricing Adjustment - adjustment against AMP expenditure - Bright Line Test (BLT) - BLT method as adopted by Ld. TPO was not a valid method to benchmark the transactions. The technical collaboration agreement as referred to by Ld. TPO did not envisage any such express arrangement / agreement between the assessee and its AE and therefore, the same could not support the case of the revenue. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Transfer Pricing Adjustment - adjustment against AMP expenditure ...

Transfer Pricing Officer's Bright Line Test Invalidated in AMP Expenditure Case; Lacks Explicit Assessee-AE Arrangement.

September 10, 2020

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

HC determined that AMP expenditure does not constitute a separate international transaction requiring transfer pricing adjustment. The Tribunal consistently applied...

The case pertains to the levy of penalty u/s 271G for failure to furnish documents and information u/ss 92CA/92D. The key points are: The Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO)...

The Principal Commissioner or Commissioner having jurisdiction over transfer pricing matters has been empowered, effective April 1, 2022, to invoke revisionary action...

ITAT ruled AMP expenses did not constitute international transaction under Section 92B, as Revenue failed to establish existence of arrangement between assessee and AE...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that in determining the arm's length price for transfer pricing adjustments, three companies (MOIAPL, LCAPL, and MOEPAPL)...

The ITAT held that the Transfer Pricing Officer's order was barred by limitation as it was not passed within 60 days from the date of the final assessment order as...

The Appellate Tribunal reviewed a case involving Transfer Pricing (TP) Adjustment for management service fee paid to Associated Enterprises. It was held that the...

ITAT ruled that the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) improperly determined Arm's Length Price (ALP) without following prescribed methods under Rule 10B. The TPO merely...

Territorial Jurisdiction - proper officer or not - Registration was assigned to Central GST Officer - SCN was issued by the State GST officer - the distribution of work...

TP Adjustment - excessive AMP expenses - third party also benefits - Revenue also could not demonstrate the presence of any machinery provision to compute Arm’s Length...

If the Transfer Pricing Officer did not agree to the arm's length price shown by the assessee it was open for him to determine the arm's length price by applying one of...

Transfer pricing adjustments, selection of the most appropriate method (MAM), benchmarking approach (aggregation or segregation), factual rendering of services, arm's...

Transfer pricing adjustment made to alleged international transaction of AMP expenditure incurred by assessee disallowed due to lack of evidence that assessee agreed to...

ITAT adjudicated transfer pricing dispute regarding comparable company selection. The tribunal determined the Arm's Length Price (ALP) computation by the Transfer...

ITAT determined that NFAC improperly exercised jurisdiction in transfer pricing appeal cases. The tribunal found that CIT(A) at NFAC erroneously assumed jurisdiction...

Quick Updates: