Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2020 Year 2020 This

Bogus purchases - AO estimated 10% of the bogus purchase - CIT ...


CIT (A) Upholds AO's Decision: 10% of Purchases Deemed Bogus Despite Payment Evidence; Bills and Vouchers Insufficient.

September 17, 2020

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Bogus purchases - AO estimated 10% of the bogus purchase - CIT (A) enhanced the addition - producing the bills and vouchers and evidencing the payment made through cheque alone will not establish that the transactions are genuine - Additions of 10% made by AO confirmed. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Bogus share transactions involving abnormal price rise in penny stock shares - Assessee produced evidence of share purchase, existence in demat account - AO failed to...

  2. CIT(A) determined profit at 5.47% on total purchases. Assessee produced sufficient evidence regarding purchases, movement of goods, GST payment on transportation,...

  3. The assessee provided documentary evidence supporting the purchase and subsequent sale of shares leading to long-term capital gains (LTCG). The evidence included...

  4. In the case of 2024 (5) TMI 1132 before the ITAT Mumbai, the issue pertained to penalty proceedings u/s. 271(1)(c) concerning the estimation of income on bogus purchases....

  5. The High Court held that once the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) found no cogent or convincing evidence from the Revenue to allege bogus purchases, it was wrong to...

  6. Addition of bogus purchases - The CIT (A) came to the conclusion that it is a case of purchases from gray market and thereafter, bills have been procured from hawala...

  7. ITAT upheld the reopening of assessment under s.147 as it was based on new facts not previously available to the AO, rejecting assessee's claim of mere "change of...

  8. Bogus purchase - AO added the entire amount of bogus purpose instead of GP ratio - CIT(A) deleted the additions - there is nothing on record which demonstrates the...

  9. The case pertains to the estimation of income and disallowance of bogus purchases. The purchases were deemed sham transactions fabricated through bogus paper concerns...

  10. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the addition u/s 68 as the assessee failed to prove the genuineness of LTCG claimed u/s 10(38). The AO found discrepancies in off-market...

  11. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the addition u/s 68 for alleged bogus Long Term Capital Gains due to off-market cash purchase of shares. The taxpayer's claim for deduction...

  12. The ITAT Mumbai upheld the disallowance made u/s. 80IA due to the assessee not claiming the deduction u/s. 80IA in response to the return filed u/s. 153A. The AO added...

  13. Estimation of income - bogus purchases - The Tribunal considered the facts surrounding the alleged bogus purchases. Despite the inability of the assessee to establish...

  14. The assessee, a university, claimed exemption u/s 10(23C)(iiiab) for the relevant assessment year, which was accepted by the Assessing Officer (AO) after considering the...

  15. The ITAT Jodhpur dealt with a case involving addition u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act concerning alleged bogus share application money. The Investigation Wing provided...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates