Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Indian Laws - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights November 2020 Year 2020 This

Dishonor of Cheque - Both the trial court and the appellate ...


Accused's Conviction Upheld for Failing to Disprove Presumption u/ss 118 and 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act.

November 18, 2020

Case Laws     Indian Laws     HC

Dishonor of Cheque - Both the trial court and the appellate court rightly held that the burden was on the accused to disprove the initial presumption under Section 118 and 139 of the N.I.Act. The burden is not discharged rightly. Hence, the conviction of the accused for the offence under Section 138 of the N.I.Act is only to be upheld. - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Accused's conviction u/s 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act upheld. Once execution of cheque admitted, presumptions u/ss 118 and 139 raised against accused. Accused...

  2. Dishonour of cheque case - petitioner-accused failed to deposit the amount despite existence of legally enforceable debt/liability. No evidence led to rebut presumption...

  3. The High Court confirmed the conviction of the revisionist u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court held that the presumptions u/ss 118 and 139 are...

  4. Presumption u/ss 118(a) and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was not properly applied by the Trial Court. When presumption u/s 139 is raised, the onus shifts to the...

  5. HC held that under Sections 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, rebuttable presumptions favor the complainant when cheque execution is admitted or proven. The...

  6. Dishonor of Cheque - standard of proof for rebuttal presumption - The accused has discharged the burden under Section 118(a) and 139 of the Negotiable Instrument Act...

  7. In a case concerning dishonor of cheques u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the Court upheld the conviction and sentence. The accused admitted issuing cheques...

  8. The High Court dealt with a case involving the dishonour of a cheque. The accused did not deny her signature on the cheque, triggering the presumption u/ss 118 and 139...

  9. The High Court considered a case involving dishonour of cheque due to insufficiency of funds, determining if a legally enforceable debt existed. The accused was...

  10. HC allowed the appeal, reversing the acquittal of Respondent No. 2 under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. The court held that the accused failed to rebut...

  11. The accused successfully rebutted the mandatory presumption u/s 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act by raising a probable defence and bringing in suspicious...

  12. In this case, the High Court addressed the issue of dishonour of a cheque u/s 138 of the N.I. Act. The accused issued a cheque in discharge of a debt but failed to pay...

  13. Dishonour of Cheque - acquittal of the accused - rebuttal of the presumption - the Learned Trial Court, by considering the legal presumption available under Section 139...

  14. The HC held that in the demand notice, if the cheque amount and other claimed amounts are mentioned separately, it is a valid notice u/s 138(b) of the NI Act....

  15. The Kerala High Court dealt with a case involving dishonor of cheques u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court considered joint trial of cases, material...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates