Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights October 2012 Year 2012 This

Rejection of refund claim - no confirmation of duty payment from ...


Refund Claim Denied: Missing Duty Payment Confirmation from Jurisdictional Central Excise Superintendent, No Triplicate Certification Provided.

October 9, 2012

Case Laws     Central Excise     CGOVT

Rejection of refund claim - no confirmation of duty payment from the jurisdictional Central Excise range Superintendent in the form of duty payment certification in triplicate. Copy of ARE-1 - rebate claim inadmissible - CGOVT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Claim of refund amount on account of double-payment of Customs Duty

  2. CESTAT allowed refund of customs duty paid twice through customs broker for same import consignment. Appellant demonstrated through Bill of Entry, payment challans, and...

  3. Refund of excise duty paid erroneously - When the appellant realized that he has paid excess duty thereafter he filed the refund application under Section 11B of the...

  4. CESTAT allowed appeal concerning refund of CVD and ACD. Original authority's rejection was based on contradictory findings - accepting CA certificate showing non-passing...

  5. Refund claim for amount deposited in PLA, whether duty or not, subject to time limitation u/s 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944. Held that Apex court in Modipon Ltd. case...

  6. Refund claim was rejected as time-barred, having been filed beyond the one-year limitation period stipulated u/s 27 of the Customs Act, 1962. The appellant had...

  7. The appellants claimed that the entire amount of service tax paid by them should be considered as a deposit u/s 35FF of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and sought a refund....

  8. The appellant sought refund of Countervailing Duty (CVD) and Special Additional Duty (SAD) paid in cash u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Section 142(3)...

  9. Refund of mandatory pre-deposit in terms of Section 35 F of Central Excise Act 1944 - Adjustment with with confirmed demand of duty - The bare perusal makes it clear...

  10. Refund of duty paid - filing of refund claim before the wrong jurisdiction - if the adjudicating authority was of the view that the appellant has not filed refund claim...

  11. Refund of duty paid - filing of refund claim before the wrong jurisdiction - if the adjudicating authority was of the view that the appellant has not filed refund claim...

  12. The case concerns the time limit for filing a refund claim of Special Additional Duty (SAD) paid by an importer. The issue is whether the one-year limitation specified...

  13. The CESTAT dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant seeking refund of central excise duty u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant's claim for refund on...

  14. Refund of central excise duty paid ignoring the benefit of exemption notification - Merely because the assessee submitted the application for eligibility on 08.01.2012,...

  15. Appellant filed refund claim which was initially rejected by original authority on grounds of ineligibility for exemption notification. Commissioner (Appeals) remanded...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates