Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights July 2021 Year 2021 This

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - assessee’ s claim of 100 % exemption ...


Court Sets Aside Principal CIT's Findings on Exemption Claim Due to Ambiguity in Chemical Item Description u/s 263.

July 9, 2021

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - assessee’ s claim of 100 % exemption of profits u/s 80 IC - Manufactured items - serial no. 5 of the negative list - on account of the clear cut ambiguity in the item mentioned/described against S.No.5, relating both to organic and inorganic chemicals, the assessee is entitled to the benefit of doubt regarding the items sought to be covered under it. - The findings of the Ld. Pr.CIT therefore to the effect that the AO’ s order was erroneous on account of inadequate enquiry having been conducted on the issue of grant of exemption u/s 80 IC of the Act to unit- II of the assessee are accordingly set aside. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The case involved a challenge to the levy of Entry Tax on "PET Reisin" and "PVC Granuels" under the Assam Entry Tax Act, 2008. The issue was whether these items could be...

  2. Service tax demand on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services rendered on reverse charge basis set aside as appellant did not collect service tax from service recipient....

  3. The High Court address the rejection of revision petition u/s 264 due to an inadvertent error in filing Form ITR-VII, resulting in denial of exemption to a trust...

  4. The Appellate Court exceeded its jurisdiction u/s 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by setting aside an arbitral award that had already been confirmed...

  5. Denial of exemption u/s 11(2) was contested due to the trust's failure to file Form No. 10 within the due date specified u/s 139(1) owing to technical issues. The...

  6. The Rajasthan High Court examined the validity of revision proceedings u/s 263 concerning the period of limitation. The issue was whether the period of limitation for...

  7. The MCPCB (Metal Core Printed Circuit Board) is to be classified under Heading 85.34 (Tariff Item 8534 0000) as 'Printed Circuits' and not under Heading 94.05 (Tariff...

  8. Levy of CVD - rubber scrap imported by the respondent - Appeal against the decision of Tribunal setting aside the demand of CVD without considering that the twin test of...

  9. The High Court held that the Land Acquisition Officer (LAO) cannot be penalized u/s 201 and 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for non-deduction of TDS on compensation...

  10. Mere change of opinion cannot justify setting aside provisional assessments. Eligibility for abatement on value of bought-out items cannot be denied without findings on...

  11. The High Court examined the issue of liability to clear statutory dues post-insolvency proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016. The resolution plan...

  12. Refund of service tax on Ocean Freight - Precedents - Validity of order of CESTAT for non-following the decision of Non-Jurisdictional High Court, in regard to...

  13. The HC set aside the impugned order dated 07.03.2024 concerning excess Input Tax Credit (ITC) claimed due to non-reconciliation of information, including ITC from...

  14. Confiscation of imported liquor cases, imposition of penalties, and demand of duty. The Tribunal held that there was no intentional misdeclaration or fraudulent intent...

  15. Cancellation of registration order quashed due to non-application of mind, absence of reasons, and violation of principles of natural justice. Court followed precedent...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates