Levy of penalty - Proceedings against the Custodian / Cargo ...

Customs

July 17, 2021

Levy of penalty - Proceedings against the Custodian / Cargo Service provider - it is alleged that appellants had allowed the cargo to move into the sterile area without checking the status of Customs clearance i.e., without checking whether LEO was given or not - The details of such unauthorized persons seen in the premises are not furnished by department. The allegation without support of any evidence cannot sustain. - No penalty - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty - Proceedings against the Custodian / Cargo ...

Customs

July 17, 2021

You may also like:

Levy of penalty u/s 117 of CA - Legality of removal of goods from Customs Area - Statutory obligation and liability of Custodian - The use of words while ‘includes the...

Customs Cargo Service Provider (CCSP) - Suspension of their CCSP approval and imposing a penalty - Demand of value of pilfered goods - custodian of Speedy CFS -...

Cargo Handling Services - moving of goods within the factory cannot be brought within the definition of “Cargo and Cargo Handling Service”

Service Tax is not leviable on the activities of the custodian where he auctions abandoned cargo and ST/VAT is paid in respect of that cargo - AT

Procedure for disposal of un-claimed/un-cleared cargo under section 48 of the Customs Act, 1962, lying with the custodians

Procedure for disposal of un-claimed/un-cleared cargo Under section. 48 of the Customs Act, 1962, lying with the custodians

Procedure for disposal of un-claimed/un-cleared cargo under section 48 of the Customs Act, 1962, lying with the custodians –reg.

Handling of Cargo in Customs Areas (Amendment) Regulations, 2019

Classification of service - the transportation of the ores located at different locations within the mining area would not fall within the definition of ‘Cargo Handling services’.

Amends the Handling of Cargo in Customs Areas Regulations, 2009 - Notification

Quick Updates: