Disallowance of expenses made u/s.37(1) - disallowance of ...

Challenge to Section 37(1) Expense Disallowance: Insufficient Justification by Assessing Officer on Business Expense Relevance.

August 17, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Disallowance of expenses made u/s.37(1) - disallowance of expenditure on adhoc basis made by the ld. AO by giving a categorical finding that the ld. AO had not even whispered in the assessment order as to how a particular expenditure of the assessee is excessive and not incurred for the purpose of business u/s.37(1) - the incurrence of business expenditure whether it is commensurate with the business receipts earned thereof is of absolutely no relevance to decide the allowability of business expenditure. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Disallowance of expenses made u/s.37(1) - disallowance of ...

Challenge to Section 37(1) Expense Disallowance: Insufficient Justification by Assessing Officer on Business Expense Relevance.

August 17, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

CIT(A) restricted addition on account of accommodation entries to 15% instead of 100%, as the Assessing Officer failed to establish that work was not actually performed....

Deduction u/s 35(2AB) for in-house Research and Development (R&D) expenses was disallowed as the assessee failed to properly explain the basis of claim and reconcile the...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that no penalty u/s 271(1)(c) can be imposed for an ad-hoc disallowance of 20% of expenses made by the Assessing Officer....

Assessment order u/s 143(3) quashed for non-issuance of show cause notice. Case transferred from faceless Assessing Officer to Jurisdictional Assessing Officer u/s...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - assessee had failed to provide full submissions - penalty levied by the Assessing Officer u/s 271(1)(b) of the IT Act deserves to be...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The Appellate Tribunal observed that the appellant, during reassessment proceedings, had filed their return of income but failed to provide...

Deduction claimed u/s 57 against income returned u/s 56 - manner of apportioning assessee's expenses to earning income u/s 56 disputed - Revenue authorities rejecting...

Key legal principles and decisions related to various disallowances and additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) under different sections of the Income Tax Act. The...

Various disallowances and additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) and the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's (ITAT) decisions on the same. The key points are: 1)...

Disallowance u/s 14A - Disallowing interest expense - Neither the assessee furnished the working of disallowances under section 14A, nor the lower authority made the...

The ITAT addressed a tax assessment dispute involving disallowance of expenses. The Assessing Officer (AO) arbitrarily disallowed 25% of certain expenses without...

ITAT set aside penalty u/s 271(1)(c) after finding no deliberate concealment. The Tribunal noted two key disallowances: first, estimated expense addition was already...

Assessment u/s 153C - disallowance made u/s 37. Assessing Officer observed no supporting evidence for claimed expenses furnished by assessee and non-cooperation during...

Penalty u/ s 271(1)(c) - Disallowance on account of personnel expenses, operative expenses and finance expenses - it a “mere disallowance” of an expense does not warrant...

ITAT ruled against disallowance of transportation expenses, finding the Assessing Officer failed to establish statutory grounds u/s 37 for rejection. The tribunal...

Quick Updates: