Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights August 2021 Year 2021 This

Rectification u/s 254 - Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was deleted - ...

Income Tax

August 21, 2021

Rectification u/s 254 - Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was deleted - Without prejudice to the above, assuming the findings of the ITAT is not correct than it would not amount to a mistake apparent from record which could be rectified under the provision of section 254(2) of the Act. If the decision of the ITAT is wrong than the aggrieved parties can approach to the Higher Judicial forum i.e. Jurisdictional High Court. But such findings cannot be rectified on the reasoning that there is a mistake apparent from the record. If we do so it would amount to review its own order by the ITAT which is not permissible. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Rectification of mistake u/s 254 - Penalty is levied in the instant case under Section 271(1)(i)(a) of the Act (as it then stood), while the explanation applies to the...

  2. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - As the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act leviable without taking the approval from the Joint/Additional Commissioner of Income Tax,...

  3. Levy of Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The ITAT ruled that since there was no variation between the returned and assessed income, there was no concealment of income by the...

  4. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Mandation of specification of charge - It is clear that for the AO to assume jurisdiction u/s 271(1)(c), proper notice is necessary and the...

  5. Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - recording of specific finding or not? - In para 7 of the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), the Assessing Officer held that it is found to be a fit...

  6. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - addition u/s 68 - Penalty has been levied in a mechanical manner without application of mind. In our view, this is a serious mistake in the...

  7. Levy of penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - defective notice - it would be too technical and pedantic to take the view that because in the printed notice the inapplicable portion...

  8. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Mere admission of an appeal by the High Court cannot without there being anything further, be an indication that the issue is debatable one so...

  9. Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - bogus claim of exemption u/s 11 - assessee claimed exemption of its income under section 11(1) of the Act without any registration under...

  10. Penalty u/s 271AAA or 271(1)(c) - The penalties u/s 271(1)(c) and 271AAA are attracted in different situations and both are mutually exclusive. Having initiated the...

  11. Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - Scope of penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of IT Act cannot be widened later to include within its scope such additions which were not...

  12. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - AO initiated penalty on one limb of section 271(1)(c) and had imposed penalty on another limb - Third Member has upheld the view of AM that the...

  13. Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - failure to comply with the notices issued - the reasons explained by the assessee are bonafide and reasonable. - penalty imposed u/s 271(1)(b)...

  14. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non-compliance of notice issues - if the quantum proceedings itself are declared to be bad in law and quashed , then any non compliance on the...

  15. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - The notice u/s. 274 r.w.s. 271(l)(c) of the Act were issued without striking off the irrelevant portion of the limb...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates