Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Non reference of matter to the TPO - ...

Income Tax

September 27, 2021

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Non reference of matter to the TPO - no prudent business person properly instructed in law would have inferred the TP risk parameter as a reason for scrutiny so as to mandatorily make reference u/s. 92C of the Act in terms of CBDT Instruction No. 3/16 and failure to make such reference made the assessment order erroneous. In our opinion, the TP risk parameter was not one of the reasons for limited scrutiny of the case and as such the PCIT was not justified in invoking jurisdiction u/s. 263 - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Non reference of matter to the TPO - ...

Income Tax

September 27, 2021

You may also like:

Revision u/s 263 - assessee had utilized the unsecured loans for non business purpose and interest paid on the same has been claimed as business expenses - matter...

Revision u/s 263 - non reference to TPO - cases as selected for scrutiny on non transfer pricing risk parameters - The necessary enquiries and examination as reasonably...

TP - retrospective applicability of sec. 92CA(2B) - powers of assessing officer to make such reference and the powers of TPO to furnish report - decided against the assessee - AT

TP adjustments - reference made to TPO - Cognizance u/s 92BA(i) - effect of omission of law - undisputedly, by the Finance Act, 2017, clause (i) of section 92BA has been...

TP Adjustment - Notional interest - interest-free advances extended by the assessee to its AE - In an uncontrolled condition and between persons other than associated...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Faulty computation of ALP - As per CIT assessment is erroneous as reference to TPO was not made - The said clause 3.3 of the Instruction...

Revision u/s 263 - AO ought to have made mandatory reference to the “TPO” for determining arm’s length price - Since the Finance Act, 2017 omitted sec. 92BA(i) from...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - the ITAT upheld the impugned order, dismissing the appeal of the assessee. The Tribunal ruled that the CIT had exercised revisional...

Revision u/s 263 - the Ld. AR has been fair enough to concede that the AO was mandatorily required to refer the same to the TPO and, therefore, we hold that the Ld. PCIT...

Revision u/s 263 - TP Adjustment - Where the direction of the DRP have been held to be part of the assessment order, then, there can be no doubt that TP order is also...

Quick Updates: