Validity of Notice of demand while stay order is in operation - ...

Income Tax

October 6, 2021

Validity of Notice of demand while stay order is in operation - differnt periods - This Court had taken only a prima facie view and passed an interim order of stay. That will not tie the hands of the authority in reiterating their stand in the rectification proceedings. - The issuance of notice of demand on 23.03.2020 has nothing to do with the interim order granted by this Court. There is no violation of the order passed by this Court, let alone willful violation - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of Notice of demand while stay order is in operation - ...

Income Tax

October 6, 2021

You may also like:

Rejection of benefit of VCES, 2013 - recovery of Interest - The recovery notice in the absence of any adjudication order prima facie is without jurisdiction - interim stay granted.

Denial of CENVAT Credit - input service - Clearance of goods from factory gate - prima facie view taken by the tribunal in the stay matter cannot have precedent value - AT

Stay of demand for penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - quantum appeal pending - assessee prima-facie having fair chance of win - enforcement for recovery would cause serious loss...

Valuation - Department viewed that the services provided by them was in the nature of finishing services and denied the benefit abatement - prima facie case in favor of...

Sharing of expenditure with group companies - demand under the BAS category prima facie not sustainable - assesse being paying service tax as BSS w.e.f. 1.4.2006, stay granted - AT

Service tax demand – rent a cab services – export of services - secondary service which are used by the primary service provider - Prima facie case in favor of assessee...

Validity of Notice u/s 143(1)(a) - Prima facie Adjustment – The procedure was not followed and the adjustment were made without notice - No addition - HC

CENVAT Credit - Residential land line telephone services - prima facie credit is allowable - stay granted - AT

SSI Exemption – there were different views during the period prior to that date - Prima facie extended period could not have been invoked - AT

Construction Service - prima faice services rendered by the appellant would be taxable from 1.7.2010 only and any demand prior to that period prima facie seems to be not...

Quick Updates: