Jurisdiction of DCIT Bengaluru to issue notice u/s 153C - ...

Jurisdiction Issue: DCIT in Bengaluru Issued Invalid Notices u/s 153C Before Official Case Transfer.

October 26, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Jurisdiction of DCIT Bengaluru to issue notice u/s 153C - transfer of case u/s 127 - it is ex-facie apparent that the notices under Section 153C were issued prior to transfer of case and jurisdiction conferred on the DCIT. It is well settled by now that any order passed without jurisdiction is invalid. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Jurisdiction of DCIT Bengaluru to issue notice u/s 153C - ...

Jurisdiction Issue: DCIT in Bengaluru Issued Invalid Notices u/s 153C Before Official Case Transfer.

October 26, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Jurisdiction of the AO to frame the assessment order - Admittedly, when the ITO realized that he did not had the pecuniary jurisdiction to issue notice, he duly...

The High Court examined the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer (AO) and the prescribed income-tax authority to issue notices u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. It held...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of notice u/s 143(2) issued by a non-jurisdictional AO. The initial notice was issued by an ITO who did not have valid...

The HC quashed the notice issued u/s 143(2) by the JAO for AY 2023-24, holding that the JAO lacked jurisdiction. As per section 144B(1)(iii), for scrutiny assessment...

Jurisdiction powers to issue Reopening notice in metro city - It was established that the notice under Section 148 of the Act was issued by an Income Tax Officer (ITO),...

The HC held that the Jurisdictional Assessment Officer (JAO) has exclusive jurisdiction to issue notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act. For assessment, re-assessment or...

Reassessment proceedings were held invalid due to lack of proper jurisdiction by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax while issuing the notice u/s 148. The...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Reasons for issuing notice u/s.148 - issue of notice by non-jurisdictional officer (Before transfer of Case) - at the time of...

Notice issued u/s 148 - Transfer of a case - The order passed by CIT transferring jurisdiction from ITO, New Delhi on 04-01-2010, subsequent action of the AO i.e. ITO...

Territorial jurisdiction of AO - As soon as the ITO realized that he lacked pecuniary jurisdiction over the assessee, the case was immediately transferred to the file of...

The court held that the Joint Assessing Officer (JAO) lacked jurisdiction to issue notices u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act for reassessment, as per Section 151A read with...

The High Court ruled that the Joint Assistant Commissioner (JAO) lacked jurisdiction to issue notices u/s 148 for reassessment of income escaping assessment. The notices...

The ITAT ruled in favor of the non-resident Indian taxpayer, invalidating the reopening of assessment under section 147. The notice under section 148 was initially...

Notice u/s 143(2) issued by a non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer/Deputy Commissioner is invalid and cannot be cured. The assessment order framed u/s 143(3) based on...

Validity of notice u/s 143(2) - scrutiny assessment - issuance of notice u/s. 143(2) by correct AO - As per CBDT instruction the scrutiny noticemust be issued by the...

Quick Updates: