Claims of amount paid for employees taken on Secondment - ...

CIT(A) Deletes Additions After AO's Contradictory Decision on Employee Secondment Payments; Revenue Fails to Prove Errors.

October 28, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Claims of amount paid for employees taken on Secondment - Revenue attribution - AO on one hand had held the secondment agreement to be not a genuine agreement but on the other hand had disallowed only 50% of the expenditure which according to us appear to be contrary. We further find that CIT(A) for the reasons stated in the order has deleted the addition. Before us, Revenue has not pointed any fallacy in the findings of CIT(A) - No additions - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Claims of amount paid for employees taken on Secondment - ...

CIT(A) Deletes Additions After AO's Contradictory Decision on Employee Secondment Payments; Revenue Fails to Prove Errors.

October 28, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Assessee engaged in business of commission agent (Aadatia) for agricultural products. AO made addition u/s 68 treating entire cash deposits in bank account as...

The CIT(A) partly allowed and restricted the addition on account of commission expenses at 0.25% as compared to 2% adopted by the Assessing Officer. The coordinate bench...

CIT(A) determined profit at 5.47% on total purchases. Assessee produced sufficient evidence regarding purchases, movement of goods, GST payment on transportation,...

This is a summary of an order from the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dealing with various additions and disallowances made by the Assessing Officer (AO) and...

Addition on account of low GP - cause and effect relationship between the defect found by the AO and the addition made - AO rejected the book results as unreliable, but...

Protective addition made by Assessing Officer was not sustainable as substantive addition did not survive in concluded assessment proceedings of related party. CIT(A)...

The assessee received cash credits which were treated as unexplained income u/s 68 by the Assessing Officer (AO). However, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)...

ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s order with key findings: (1) Electronic evidence seized during search was admissible under Section 65B of Indian Evidence Act, (2) Cash receipts...

Protective assessment - Addition u/s 69/69C - Unaccounted investment ad unaccounted commission - CIT(A) has confirmed the substantive additions on the three entities so...

CIT(A) deleted addition on unaccounted business income, accepting assessee's retraction of statement recorded u/s 132(4). CIT(A) agreed cash payment of 60 crores by...

Disallowance at 2% of total labour expenditure - CIT-A deleted the addition partly - The CIT(A) observed the claim of deleting entire disallowance is not acceptable in...

Addition to assessee's income by enhancing closing stock value made by Assessing Officer (AO) u/s 143(3) was based solely on statement recorded during survey without any...

The assessment reopening u/s 147 read with Section 148 was found to be unsustainable due to the lack of independent application of mind by the Commissioner of Income Tax...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) adjudicated on various additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) as unexplained/bogus credits or trading liabilities. The...

Protective assessment/addition - No substantive assessment/addition in the hands of other assessee - It is therefore a case where no substantive additions have been made...

Quick Updates: