Area based exemption - appellant paid an amount equal to 6% ...

Appellant's 6% Payment u/r 6(3) Reviewed; Rule 6(3D) Overlooked in Exemption Eligibility, Case Remanded.

January 7, 2022

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Area based exemption - appellant paid an amount equal to 6% under rule 6(3) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 - It is found that the adjudicating authority has not touched upon rule 6(3D) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 while deciding the eligibility of the exemption notification no. 30/2004-CE - matter remanded back - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Area based exemption - appellant paid an amount equal to 6% ...

Appellant's 6% Payment u/r 6(3) Reviewed; Rule 6(3D) Overlooked in Exemption Eligibility, Case Remanded.

January 7, 2022

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Benefit of exemption subject to the condition that no Cenvat Credit is availed - The appellant are eligible for exemption under Notification No. 30/2004-C.E. when they...

Appellants engaged in manufacturing dutiable goods and providing exempted trading services failed to maintain separate accounts for input services utilized in both...

Scope of exemption notification - Absolute exemption or conditional exemption - In the present case, the goods were supplied under notification No. 108/1995-CE depending...

Adjustment of excess service tax paid with subsequent service tax liability - case of Revenue is that Rule 6 (3) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 do not provide for such...

Reversal of CENVAT Credit - There is no requirement under Rule 6(3)(i) and Rule 6(3A) of the Cenvat Credit Rules that the option had to be exercised on the first day of...

CENVAT Credit - Rule 6(3) of CCR - If the appellant has not availed Cenvat credit in respect of ‘Common Cenvatable Input Services’ the provisions of Rule 6(3) would not...

CENVAT Credit - exempt goods - On merits, it is a case that the appellant is manufacturing dutiable goods not exempted goods. Some clearances were exempted from payment...

Correctness of erasure of credit already availed by prospective invalidation of eligibility for retention of credit that would subject those services already procured...

The appellant had reversed CENVAT credit amount u/r 6(3) for goods cleared for export under Notification No. 4/2006-CE and claimed refund. CESTAT held that reversal u/r...

CENVAT Credit - Whether the department can demand and recover under Rule 14 an amount under Rule 6(3) (i) equal to 10% of the value of the exempted products? - under no...

Illegal detention of imported goods - waiver of the dammurage charges - The order passed by the Customs Authority dated 25th March, 2022 is binding upon the respondent...

Refund claim of service tax paid on cancelled transactions - Post GST era - Rejection of refund under Rule 6(3) of Service Tax Rules read with Sec 142(5) of CGST Act -...

Exemption from payment of sales tax - supply of the specified drugs to WHO - Sub-section 3 of Section 6 of CST Act - The interplay of the provisions of the Sub-section 3...

The appellant has reversed the credit taken on inputs used in production of goods cleared under end-use exemption notification - rule 6(3) is not applicable to appellant - AT

Appellant filed refund claim which was initially rejected by original authority on grounds of ineligibility for exemption notification. Commissioner (Appeals) remanded...

Quick Updates: