Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Service Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights February 2022 Year 2022 This

Extended period of limitation - waiver of penalty - The only ...


Order Alleges 'Suppression of Facts' but Lacks Evidence of Intent; Impacts Limitation Period & Penalty Waiver.

February 11, 2022

Case Laws     Service Tax     AT

Extended period of limitation - waiver of penalty - The only allegation of these elements held against the appellant in the impugned order is that of ‘suppression of facts‘ and the reason for this is that they have not disclosed the full value of the taxable services in their ST-3 returns. It is also accepted in the impugned order that these services were all duly recorded by the appellant. It is now well established legal principle that ‘suppression of facts‘ is not mere omission. It must be a deliberate act with mens rea to suppress and thereby evade. The facts brought out in the impugned order do not demonstrate the mens rea - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Extended period of limitation - Suppression of facts or not - The returns contained all the requisite details as that of the invoice numbers, the amount of invoice, the...

  2. Invoking the extended period of limitation u/s 11A(1) of the Central Excise Act for recovery of unpaid duty. The key points are: The department alleged suppression of...

  3. Extended period of limitation - It is clear that even when an assessee has suppressed facts, the extended period of limitation can be invoked only when “suppression’ is...

  4. Extended period of limitation - The very fact that the appellant is contesting the issue of invoking larger period of limitation, that the rendering of service under the...

  5. The key points are: Appropriation of Rs. 11,00,000 deposited under protest during investigation cannot be considered as acceptance of liability. The extended period of...

  6. The Tribunal held that the extended period of limitation of five years under proviso to Section 73(1) of the Finance Act could not have been invoked in the present case....

  7. Central excise duty exemption notification dated 01.03.2002 was denied, leading to recovery of duty, interest, and penalty. The extended period of limitation was invoked....

  8. Extended period of limitation - manpower recruitment or supply agency service - separate employment contract with foreign expatriates - even if it were to be assumed...

  9. Extended period of limitation - works contract - suppression of facts or not - Unless the adjudicating authority had come to a conclusion that the extended period of...

  10. Extended period of limitation - Various factors have not been examined by the Commissioner in the impugned order and a conclusion has merely been drawn that because...

  11. Extended period of limitation - Suppression of facts or not - The allegation of suppressing the facts from the department does not hold good in the event of periodic...

  12. Invocation of extended period of limitation under proviso to section 73(1) of Finance Act, 1994 requires wilful suppression of facts with intent to evade service tax...

  13. Failure to produce supporting documents before audit team does not constitute suppression of facts to invoke extended period of limitation u/s 73(1) of Finance Act, 1994....

  14. Extended period of limitation - suppression of facts or not - It is for the Superintendent to scrutinize the returns and ascertain if the service tax had been paid...

  15. Invocation of extended period of limitation - wilful suppression of facts - Even suppression of facts has to be wilful and in any case, suppression has also to be with...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates