Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - When the matter travelled to the ...

Income Tax

February 11, 2022

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - When the matter travelled to the Tribunal, the explanation which was given by the assessee and accepted by the CIT(A) was once again examined by the Tribunal and after noting several decisions as to under what circumstances penalty can be imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act as also the fact that there was nothing on record to show that the assessee had purposely made a wrong claim, confirmed the order passed by the CIT(A). - No penalty - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - When the matter travelled to the ...

Income Tax

February 11, 2022

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on addition made u/s 68 - the assessee has given sufficient explanation though not found satisfactory by AO - No merit in levying penalty.

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - disallowance of depreciation - he explanation given by the assessee for the claim of depreciation is neither bona fide nor...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - credit worthiness and genuineness of the transaction - Gifts by family friends – the explanation given by the assessee is totally false -...

Imposition of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The explanation given by the assessee for the depreciation claim, is neither bona-fide, nor substantiated - penalty confirmed - HC

Explanation versus bona finde explanation versus proper disclosure - Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - AT

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – the penalty imposed for disallowing claim of expenditure on foreign education and foreign travelling cannot be upheld - AT

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - Transfer pricing adjustment - assessee advanced interest free loan to its AE - The Tribunal noted that the assessee had disclosed all...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of expenses of foreign Travel expenses and inter city travel expenses - Revenue has not rejected the explanation of the...

Validity of confirmation of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – ssessee miserably failed to offer an explanation for the cash credit raised in the form of share application money -...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – Tribunal proceeded on hyper- technicalities and acted as though every seizure must entail initiation of proceedings u/s 271 of the Act - no penalty - HC

Quick Updates: