Levy of penalty on Director u/r 26 of CER - involvement of the ...

Central Excise

March 3, 2022

Levy of penalty on Director u/r 26 of CER - involvement of the director of the appellants in clandestine activities or not - here are not much reasoning has been assigned by the said order, to show that Director was having mens rea or direct involvement for invocation of Rule 26 - Since the impugned order fails to establish the ingredient of “mens rea” on the part of the Appellant 2 who was otherwise performing their duties as employee of the company, the penalties imposed on the Director, cannot be upheld. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty on Director u/r 26 of CER - involvement of the ...

Central Excise

March 3, 2022

You may also like:

Penalty under Rule 26 and u/s 11AC - Personal penalty on Director, transporter and other persons - Clandestine manufacture and clearance of goods - levy of penalty...

Levy of penalty under Rule 25 cannot be imposed upon the main appellant for goods not manufactured by him - however penalty on director under Rule 26 confirmed - AT

Recovery of Cenvat credit - goods seized and confiscated are imported goods thus the provision of the Rules 25/26 of CER not applicable to the sized imported consignment...

Imposition of Penalty u/r 26 of CER, 2002 - quantum of penalty - clandestine removal - appellant unknowingly got involved as an employee in the clandestine activity of...

Imposition of penalty u/r 26 of CER 2002 on transporters - clandestine removal - there is no evidence to prove that the lorry drivers or the owners had involved...

Penalty u/r 26 of CER, 2002 - Clandestine manufacture and removal - If providing blank challans/invoices to a company to enable them to remove the manufactured goods...

Penalty on directors - Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules - Rule 26 is prima facie in excess of the Rule making power conferred under the Central Excise Act, 1944 - HC

Penalty under rule 26 of the CER, 2002 can be imposed on a person only when it is proved beyond doubt that the person dealing with excisable goods knew or had reason to...

In absence of direct or indirect involvement of the Managing Director in the clandestine removal of the goods no personal penalty under Rule 26 is imposable on him. - AT

Levy of penalty on Director of the company - The appellant being a Director of the Company involved in the entire Modus Operandi of fraudulent availment of credit and...

Quick Updates: