Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights May 2022 Year 2022 This

Validity of order of settlement commission - Demand of ...

Customs

May 12, 2022

Validity of order of settlement commission - Demand of differential duty - undervaluation - If the Settlement Commission was of the view that the writ applicant failed to make “full and true’ disclosure of the duty liability, it should have rejected the settlement application. The writ applicant should have been relegated to suffer and undergo the adjudication mechanism and procedure as per the provisions of the Act. - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Refund claim - Adjustment of differential duty in refund sanctioned - adjudicating authority rightly adjusted the refund claim against the demand of differential duty - AT

  2. Valuation - job work - The main appellant (Avtec) are liable to pay differential duty due to revised valuation of FOC materials supplied by GMI. - AT

  3. Demand of differential duty and interest - demand towards cash discounts availed for which prompt payments are not made by the customers within the specified period -...

  4. Demand for interest on delayed payment of duty - appellant is liable to pay the interest on the differential duty paid through supplementary invoices.

  5. Captive consumption - excise duty upon molasses - Suppression of value of goods - Demand of differential duty - The burden is upon the proper officer. - HC

  6. MRP valuation – Interest on differential duty liability due to alternation of MRP at Depot - footwear – matter remanded back - AT

  7. Demand of interest on differential duty - the claim of the appellant that since the assessment was provisional, therefore, interest is not applicable, is not correct,...

  8. Demand of differential Duty - Revenue has only wasted its energy when there is no revenue loss and therefore, unjustifiably extended the larger period of limitation, for nothing.

  9. Liability of interest u/s 11 of CEA, 1944 - price variation clause - payment of duty on differential amount - interest demand upheld - AT

  10. Interest on delayed payment of differential duty - period of limitation - demand of interest issued after 3 years, hence barred by limitation - AT

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates