Determination of taxable turnover presuming sales - As far as ...

Assessee not required to prove absence of purchase suppression; Department failed to show evidence of taxable turnover.

June 23, 2022

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax HC

Determination of taxable turnover presuming sales - As far as the present case is concerned again, the Assessee cannot be expected to negatively prove that there was no purchase suppression. The Assessee in fact placed materials to show that the transaction was a loan transaction. If the Department was to doubt it, it had the onus then shifted to the Department to show that there was in fact the transaction which mimicked purchase suppression. With the Department not having discharged the onus, the authorities below including the Tribunal, the ACST and the STO were in error in proceeding on a presumption that it was a case of purchase suppression. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Determination of taxable turnover presuming sales - As far as ...

Assessee not required to prove absence of purchase suppression; Department failed to show evidence of taxable turnover.

June 23, 2022

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax HC

You may also like:

Bogus purchases - assessee has shown purchases from ‘A’ but actually procured the material from ‘B’. In this exercise, the assessee might have saved Excise Duty etc. -...

The assessee had made purchases from M/s. HJM Fuels Pvt. Ltd., which the Department treated as bogus and added a profit element. The assessee pointed out discrepancies...

Goods under dispute were sawn New Zealand pine logs classified under CTH 4403 by the importer, while the department sought to reclassify them under CTH 4407. The key...

Additions towards Bogus purchases - When the figures of purchase shown by the assessee in the profit and loss account are matching with the figures certified by the...

Bogus purchases - department had neither disputed the assessee's sales nor shown any discrepancy between the purchases shown and the sales declared - the Tribunal was...

The appellant failed to prove the genuineness of the purchase transactions, and the goods were received from parties other than those from whom they were shown to have...

‘Consulting Engineering Services' - it is onus on the department to prove that the appellant has received this amount as “Consulting Engineering Firm” which the...

The appellant manufactured polyester staple fiber (PSF) using PET bottles scrap (90%) and popcorn waste (less than 10%). The department denied the nil/concessional duty...

Extended period of limitation - Suppression of facts or not - The returns contained all the requisite details as that of the invoice numbers, the amount of invoice, the...

HC ruled in favor of revenue department, reversing lower authorities' decision to apply 12.5% estimation on bogus purchases. Assessee failed to explain source of...

Hon'ble ITAT held that assessee failed to prove business expediency for cash purchases exceeding Rs. 20,000 hence disallowance u/s 40A(3) was justified. Cash deposits in...

Addition u/s 69C - bogus purchase bills - AO was having complete information about those parties - The ld. AO himself made any enquiry with those parties further with...

Bogus purchases - addition made towards entire bogus purchase - Assessee has literally wasted precious time of the AO by once again issuing notices and summons to the...

Bogus purchase bills from certain ‘hawala’ dealers - The Tribunal found the assessee failed to substantiate the genuineness of the purchases from alleged Hawala dealers,...

Bogus purchases - the purchases shown by the assessee is not in doubt, but the assessee might have not purchased from these parties who he might have purchased it from...

Quick Updates: