Reopening of assessment - failure to take steps under section ...

Income Tax

January 9, 2013

Reopening of assessment - failure to take steps under section 143(3) will not render the Assessing Officer powerless to initiate reassessment proceedings - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Reopening of assessment - failure to take steps under section ...

Income Tax

January 9, 2013

You may also like:

Reopening of the assessment u/s 147 – failure to take steps u/s 143(3) will not render the Assessing Officer powerless to initiate reassessment proceedings even when...

Validity of Reopening of assessment - failure to take steps under section 143(3) will not render the Assessing Officer powerless to initiate reassessment proceedings...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Bypassing the option to initiate scrutiny assessment u/s 143(3) - The assessment proceedings would cease to be pending either by...

Reopening of assessment - failure to take steps u/s.143(3) will not render the AO powerless to initiate reassessment proceedings u/s.147 r.w.sec.148 of the Act, though...

Re-opening of assessment u/s 147 - failure to take steps under section 143(3) will not render the Assessing Officer powerless to initiate reassessment proceedings even...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - non-issue of a notice u/s 143(2) - The Circular reinforces the position that it is sine qua non for the Assessing Officer to assume...

Assessment u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 - The annulment of assessment done under section 143(3) by the higher judicial authorities, itself, cannot be a ground for reopening - AT

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Once a query has been raised by Assessing Officer through the assessment proceeding and the assessee has responded to that query, it...

So long as the ingredients of section 147 are fulfilled, the AO is free to initiate proceeding u/s 147 and failure to take steps u/s 143(3) will not render the AO...

Reopening of assessment - if the Assessing Officer is to reopen the finding rendered in the scrutiny assessment, then it would clearly amount to change of opinion, which...

Quick Updates: