Valuation of imported goods - Brand New Azimut 68 Motor Yacht ...

Valuation of Azimut 68 Yacht Upheld; Lack of Purchase Evidence Justifies Duty and Interest u/r 9, Confiscation u/s 111(l.

July 5, 2022

Case Laws Customs AT

Valuation of imported goods - Brand New Azimut 68 Motor Yacht with Accessories - the appellant had not submitted any documentary evidences with regard to the purchase of the said goods and accordingly, the determination of the value of such goods under Rule 9 ibid is justified and thus, cannot be interfered with at this juncture. Therefore, the differential duty along with interest in the impugned order on the said goods is proper and justified and are liable for confiscation under Section 111 (l) ibid. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Valuation of imported goods - Brand New Azimut 68 Motor Yacht ...

Valuation of Azimut 68 Yacht Upheld; Lack of Purchase Evidence Justifies Duty and Interest u/r 9, Confiscation u/s 111(l.

July 5, 2022

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

The assessee purchased agricultural land whose stamp duty valuation was lower than the actual purchase consideration. The authorities sought to invoke section 56(2)(x)...

Bogus share transactions involving abnormal price rise in penny stock shares - Assessee produced evidence of share purchase, existence in demat account - AO failed to...

CIT(A) determined profit at 5.47% on total purchases. Assessee produced sufficient evidence regarding purchases, movement of goods, GST payment on transportation,...

Addition u/s 68 - Bogus share capital and share premium received. The assessee failed to prove the identity and creditworthiness of the subscriber companies and the...

Addition u/s 68 OR 41(1) - unexplained cash credit - Cessation of liability - The appellant contested additions to their income, alleging bogus sundry creditors. Despite...

The Appellate Tribunal upheld the addition u/s 68 as the assessee failed to prove the genuineness of LTCG claimed u/s 10(38). The AO found discrepancies in off-market...

Additions u/s 68 - Any appellate authority cannot reject the evidences without any discussion or reason. The CIT (A) has not mentioned as to what more evidence were...

Undervaluation of imported goods - Patchouli Oil - The CESTAT found that the rejection of the declared value lacked legal basis and was unsupported by evidence. The...

Addition u/s 68 as accommodation entries - long term capital gain on sale of shares as sham/bogus transaction - Mere suspicion cannot be a ground for treating the...

The Appellate Tribunal upheld the addition u/s 68 for alleged bogus Long Term Capital Gains due to off-market cash purchase of shares. The taxpayer's claim for deduction...

The ITAT held that deduction of interest u/s 57 against interest income must be substantiated by the assessee. Interest expenditure must be incurred for earning interest...

Validity of additions made u/s 153A, 69C, 68, and 69A of the Income Tax Act. It discusses the lack of incriminating material or documents found during the search to...

Additions u/sec 68 in respect of sale of shares and u/sec 69 in respect of estimated commission expenditure - The Tribunal, relying upon the judicial precedents, found...

Unsecured loans treated as unexplained cash credits u/s 68. Interest paid on such unexplained loans also added to income. Assessee's contention of repayment of loans...

The ITAT partly allowed the assessee's appeal. Travel expenses were partly disallowed by 30% considering personal element, while 70% were allowed as business expenses...

Quick Updates: