Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights August 2022 Year 2022 This

Clandestine Removal - allegation of two sets of invoices - ...


Admissibility of Evidence Challenged in Clandestine Removal Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 36B of Central Excise Act.

August 22, 2022

Case Laws     Central Excise     AT

Clandestine Removal - allegation of two sets of invoices - admissible evidences - it is found that the department has not complied with Section 36B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 while retrieving the data from the hard disc. The provision does not say that if the documents are sent to Central Forensic Laboratory, Hyderabad, it would become admissible. Further, such documents have been compared with the photocopies of the printouts sent by the Income Tax Department to the Central Excise investigating officers. Such documents cannot be relied for confirmation of duty, when obtained without following the mandate under Section 36B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. 100% EOU - Clandestine removal - case of the department is on the ground that deemed export clearance were not genuine and were shown only on paper - The entire case of...

  2. Clandestine removal - The standard of evidences need not be as high as in criminal proceedings, where the charges are required to be established beyond reasonable doubts....

  3. Clandestine Removal - clandestine removal is a serious charge and requires to be substantiated by evidence encompassing various activities in the chain of events. - The...

  4. Clandestine removal - MS Ingots - the findings of clandestine removal cannot be upheld based upon the third party documents, unless there is clinching evidence of...

  5. The case involves a dispute regarding valuation for import assessment. The appellant challenges the rejection of declared value in favor of depreciated value in the...

  6. Clandestine removal - Invoices pink coloured [Duplicate for transporter] are found in factory, hence, it can also be inferred logically that goods were not transported...

  7. Clandestine Removal - Ingots - the charges levelled against the appellants for clandestine manufacture and removal of final products, without payment of duty are not...

  8. Clandestine removal of excisable goods alleged based on statements recorded from partners, employees, and buyers. Section 9D of Central Excise Act mandates...

  9. Clandestine removal - consumption of electricity - the charge of clandestine removal is to be established on examination of facts of each case and not merely on the...

  10. Clandestine removal - suppression of production - Merely deposit of money at the time of investigation would not amount to acceptance of allegations of clandestine...

  11. Clandestine Removal - documents seized by the investigating team from the residence of the Accountant - corroborative evidence or not - The charge of clandestine removal...

  12. Clandestine removal - on the basis of third party records - As Revenue has failed to produce any supporting evidence in their favour, therefore, the charge of...

  13. Clandestine removal - penalty - The unquestioned documentary evidence would suffice to establish the clandestine removal and the handling of such goods by M/s Royal...

  14. Clandestine removal of goods - assumption / presumption - demand based on the statement - charge of clandestine removal is not sustainable in the absence of any...

  15. Clandestine removal and under valuation - private records - presumption - The Revenue has miserably failed to produce corroboration evidence on records so as to...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates