Refund claim - rejection on the ground of limitation, unjust ...

Refund Claim Denied for Late Filing After Finance Bill 2016 Deadline; Unjust Enrichment Not Considered Relevant.

August 23, 2022

Case Laws Service Tax AT

Refund claim - rejection on the ground of limitation, unjust enrichment - In the instance case service tax was liable to be paid at the relevant time and it is only subsequently that by a retrospective amendment, exemption was granted with a specific condition that refund could be claimed by filing it within six months from the date of enactment of the Finance Bill 2016. The refund claim had, therefore, to be filed within six month from 14.05.2016, but it was filed beyond the said period. - Once the refund claim is held to be barred by time, the question of unjust enrichment would not arise. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund claim - rejection on the ground of limitation, unjust ...

Refund Claim Denied for Late Filing After Finance Bill 2016 Deadline; Unjust Enrichment Not Considered Relevant.

August 23, 2022

Case Laws Service Tax AT

You may also like:

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Initially claim filed without challenging the self-assessed Bills of Entry - During the appeal process, the appellant sought to amend...

The appellant filed bills of entry claiming exemption under Notification No. 46/2011-Cus, which was denied during re-assessment. The Commissioner (Appeals) rectified...

Refund claims – unjust enrichment – service tax paid under protest – refund allowed - AT

Unjust enrichment - refund claim - bar of unjust enrichment not applicable to imported capital goods used captively by the importer - refund cannot be denied.

Refund claim - The decision of ITC Limited is not applicable to the present facts and circumstances of the case as at the time of filing of Bills of Entry, the appellant...

Show cause notice demanding interest was confirmed by the original Adjudicating Authority and settled under SVLDRS Scheme, thus refund of the confirmed amount does not...

The appellant sought refund of countervailing duty (CVD) paid while importing goods declared as 'Natural gum in raw form' through Bills of Entry filed during 2011-2014....

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - Duty paid twice - e appellants are entitled for refund claim for duty paid on Ethanol - unjust enrichment is not applicable - AT

Rejection of refund claim - residential complex services - Section 102 of Finance Act, 1994 - In the instant case, the refund claim was not filed within a period of six...

Refund - unjust enrichment - excise duty has not been claimed from the buyer of the goods and the same has been reflected in “Excise Duty Refund Receivable Account” -...

Service tax refund claim filed beyond statutory limitation period cannot be entertained. Refund application must be filed within one year from relevant date as per...

Appellant filed refund claim which was initially rejected by original authority on grounds of ineligibility for exemption notification. Commissioner (Appeals) remanded...

The CESTAT examined the applicability of the doctrine of unjust enrichment u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, for refund claims. It held that Rule 6(3) of the CCR...

Refund - principles of unjust enrichment - the unjust enrichment is not applicable even when the refund amount is claimed as expenses in the Profit and Loss Account.

Refund claim - Cess - unjust enrichment - The amount realized from the foreign buyer was only FOB value - the refund of cess is not hit by unjust enrichment

Quick Updates: