Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights November 2022 Year 2022 This

Confiscation of imported goods - penalty u/s 112(a) (i) of ...


Confiscation of Samsung-branded LED lights under Customs Act Section 112(a)(i) deemed invalid due to notification delay.

November 18, 2022

Case Laws     Customs     AT

Confiscation of imported goods - penalty u/s 112(a) (i) of Customs Act - LED Module Lights Brand Samsung - suspension was made on 22.03.2017 pursuant to examination of the goods. However, the Customs have given intimation to the right holder – Samsung Electronics Co. on 11.04.2017 i.e. after about 20 days and thus, have violated the time line - confiscation and penalty is bad and against the provisions of the law - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Exemption from duty of customs - import of Lithium Ion Cell (Captive Consumption - For LED) - Emergency LED Light is fundamentally a type of LED light, albeit a...

  2. This case deals with the valuation of 'rough diamonds' imported into India and the subsequent discrepancy between the declared value and the reassessed value by customs...

  3. Imposition of penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act, 1962 - import of LED battern fixture, LED panel light, LED flood light etc. - prohibited goods or not - the BIS number...

  4. The case involved the forfeiture of a security deposit under regulation 20 of the Customs House Agents' Licencing Regulations, 2014 due to breaches of regulations 13(a),...

  5. Suspension of Customs Broker License - Deemed Suspension or automatic suspension? - There is no existence of any provision of “Deemed Suspension” or “automatic...

  6. The case involved a challenge to the imposition of penalties and confiscation of goods under the Customs Act, 1962. The Appellate Tribunal found that the penalties...

  7. Re-export of confiscated goods - Misdeclaration of imported goods - SAMSUNG Brand LED TVs - only for the reason that the models imported by the Appellant were not...

  8. Smuggling - Absolute confiscation of foreign currency seized from the Appellant u/s 113(d),(e) & (h) of the Customs Act - The Tribunal found that there was only a venial...

  9. STI, a wholly owned subsidiary of Samsung Korea, was engaged in the manufacture and sale of mobile handsets under the Samsung brand in India and overseas markets. The...

  10. CESTAT set aside the confiscation of foreign liquors and various foreign goods as well as penalties imposed under Sections 112(a) and 112(b) of the Customs Act, 1962...

  11. Export of Goods - Mis-declaration of Mud additive chemicals for oil well - Confiscation - The Tribunal found that the Commissioner's decision to confiscate the goods was...

  12. Confiscation of land, buildings etc. - invocation of powers under Rule 173(Q)(2) of Central Excise Rules, 1944 on 26.03.2007 and 29.03.2007 for confiscation of land,...

  13. Confiscation - importer - the definition of 'importer' under Section 2 (26) of the Customs Act, 1962 - AT

  14. The case involved the scope for retention of penalty u/s 112 of Customs Act, 1962 after liability to confiscation was set aside. Confiscation pertains to goods, while...

  15. The interplay between Sections 129 and 130 of the CGST Act was analyzed. Section 129 applies when goods are in transit, while Section 130 allows confiscation and penalty...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates