Search and seizure - mere possession of money, bullion, jewelery ...

Court Rules Possession of Valuables Alone Insufficient for Tax Disclosure Belief by Officers.

February 6, 2013

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Search and seizure - mere possession of money, bullion, jewelery or such valuable article or thing per-se would not be sufficient to enable the competent officer to form a belief that the same had not been or would not be disclosed for the purpose of the Act. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Search and seizure - mere possession of money, bullion, jewelery ...

Court Rules Possession of Valuables Alone Insufficient for Tax Disclosure Belief by Officers.

February 6, 2013

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

The plaintiff sought a mandatory injunction for possession of the suit property and a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from dispossessing or interfering...

The High Court examined whether proper show cause notices were issued before passing impugned orders u/s 73(9) of the State GST Act. It held that the summary of show...

Supplementary refund of unutilized input tax credit pertaining to Compensatory Cess - Section 164 of the GST Act empowers the Government to frame rules. Refund of...

The High Court upheld the constitutional validity of the Chhattisgarh Sthaniya Kshetra me Mal Ke Pravesh Par Kar Adhiniyam, 1976 (Local Body Tax or Entry Tax Act),...

Legality of search & seizure operations – mere possession of money, bullion, jewellery or such valuable article or thing per-se would not be sufficient to enable the...

The Income-tax (ninth Amendment) Rules, 2025 mandate that individuals allotted a PAN based on Aadhaar application forms filed before 1 October 2024 must disclose their...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - As examined the belief of the Assessing Officer to a limited extent to look into whether there was sufficient or any tangible materials...

Adjustment of excess service tax paid with subsequent service tax liability - case of Revenue is that Rule 6 (3) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 do not provide for such...

The High Court held that the Land Acquisition Officer (LAO) cannot be penalized u/s 201 and 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for non-deduction of TDS on compensation...

Safe Harbour Rule - Income-tax (18th Amendment) Rules, 2022 - Amends Rule 10TD - Notification

The High Court held that for levying penalty u/s 271D for violation of Section 269SS, the Assessing Officer must record satisfaction that the provisions were violated....

Bogus sundry creditors - Whether CIT(A) had clearly violated the provisions of Rule 46A of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, while admitting additional evidence? - The High...

HC upheld validity of Rule 36(4) of CGST Rules, dismissing constitutional challenge. Court determined Rule 36(4) derives authority from Section 16 of CGST Act and...

The High Court held that respondent No. 3 cannot avoid deciding the petitioners' application dated 20 December 2023 seeking an advance ruling on the taxability of sale...

Refund claim of service tax paid on cancelled transactions - Post GST era - Rejection of refund under Rule 6(3) of Service Tax Rules read with Sec 142(5) of CGST Act -...

Quick Updates: