When Constitutional Courts are called upon to interpret ...

Appellant's Claim u/s 111A of Companies Act for SEBI Regulation Breach Dismissed by Constitutional Court.

January 7, 2023

Case Laws Companies Law SC

When Constitutional Courts are called upon to interpret provisions affecting the exercise of powers and jurisdictions of these regulatory bodies, it is the duty of such Courts to ensure that transactions falling within the province of the regulators are necessarily subjected to their scrutiny and regulation. This will ensure that the regulatory body, charged with the duty to protect the consumers has real time control over the sector, thus, realizing the purpose of their constitution. - The Appellant is not justified in invoking the jurisdiction of the CLB under Section 111A of the Act for violation of SEBI regulations. - SC

View Source

← Previous Next →

When Constitutional Courts are called upon to interpret ...

Appellant's Claim u/s 111A of Companies Act for SEBI Regulation Breach Dismissed by Constitutional Court.

January 7, 2023

Case Laws Companies Law SC

You may also like:

The appellant's claim for Rs. 9.21 crores, arising from the termination of an agreement due to non-renewal of a performance bank guarantee, was not considered by the...

SC dismissed appeal concerning liquidated damages claim under plant machinery delivery contract. Court held appellant's claim for Rs.107.54 lakhs was not based on Clause...

The appellant's application seeking attachment of a flat in lieu of the mandatory pre-deposit u/s 43(5) of the RERA was dismissed. The court held that the appellant...

RP rightly rejected belated claim filed by Appellant much beyond extended 90-day period from public announcement as per IBC and CIRP Regulations. RP lacks adjudicatory...

The NCLAT dismissed the appeal filed by the Appellant challenging the approval of the resolution plan for the Corporate Debtor. The key points are: The Interim...

The NCLAT dismissed appellants' attempt to submit belated claims after a resolution plan had already been approved by both the CoC and Adjudicating Authority. The...

Rejection of refund claim - eligible exemption - In the facts of the present case, there are no clear averments made by the appellant that conditions prescribed under...

NCLAT upheld rejection of appellant's belated claim for interest payments in liquidation proceedings. Appellant failed to file claims within prescribed timeline and...

HC dismissed the appeal, upholding penalties against the appellant for customs duty evasion. The court found the appellant's claims of merely lending his Importer...

Revocation of Customs Broker License - Overvaluation and misdeclaration with intent to claim drawback under section 75 of Customs Act, 1962 - The tribunal acknowledged...

The High Court refused to condone the delay of 4486 days in filing an appeal against a money recovery decree. The delay was inordinate, and the appellant, a limited...

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the findings of the Single Judge on the limitation period for a suit. The appellant did not dispute the legal...

Contempt of Court - willful disobedience - The breach of undertaking amounts to contempt as defined under Section 2 (b) of Contempt of Court Act but a remedy is provided...

The Andhra Pradesh High Court dismissed a petition challenging the cancellation of GST registration. The court found that the petitioner did not file a reply to the show...

SC upheld the conviction of the appellant under Section 85(i)(a) of the Employees' State Insurance Act for failing to remit ESI contributions deducted from employees'...

Quick Updates: