Penalty under rule 15 of CCR, 2004 or Rule 26 of Central Excise ...

Central Excise

February 11, 2013

Penalty under rule 15 of CCR, 2004 or Rule 26 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 - Department cannot be permitted to issue such corrigendum or to issue a fresh show-cause notice after adjudication of the case - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty under rule 15 of CCR, 2004 or Rule 26 of Central Excise ...

Central Excise

February 11, 2013

You may also like:

Revocation of registration under Central Excise - Revocation of registration, not provided for in Central Excise Rules, 2002 and only in exercise of power of Central...

Rebate of duty on exports - Compound duty on Pan Masala Packing - Rule 14 - the stand of the department that no rebate can be allowed under Rule 14 of the Central Excise...

Penalty - Bogus invoice issued without selling the goods – penalty would be attracted under Rule 25 (1) (d) as well as Rule 26(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - AT

Since Appellant were paying the duty utilizing the CENVAT Credit they cannot be charged for contravention of the provisions of Rule 4, 8(1), 8(3) & 8(3A) of the Central...

Vires of Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - At least four different High Courts have struck down the constitutional validity of Rule 8(3A) of Central Excise...

Remission of duty under Rule 21 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - In case of breakage/destruction of final product, remission can be claimed under Rule 21 of Central...

Revocation of Central Excise Registration - very person, who produces or manufactures any excisable goods, shall get registered. Thus, without registration, the...

Penalty under Rule 26(1) of Central excise rules 2002 - Bogus Cenvatable invoices issued - the appellant was liable to pay penalty - AT

Penalty u/r 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - appellant was Director during relevant period - Since the demand of the duty has already been settled under SVLDRS...

Penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - Contravention of Rule 8(3A) - penalty under Rule 25 is not permissible, but penalty under Rule 27 is to be imposed - AT

Power to levy penalty for violation of CENVAT Credit Rules - Challenge to the validity of rule 13(2) of CCR 2002 and Rule 15(2) of CCR, 2004 as ultra-virus to Central...

Penatly - default in payment of duty - provisions of Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - penalty under Rule 27 only can be imposed - no penalty under Rule 25...

Cenvat Credit denied on the ground that invoices did not contain necessary details as required under Rule 11 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 - The fact that Rule 9(2) is...

Provisions contained in Rule 8 does not absolve the assessee from substantial conditions of payment of duty of claim of rebate of duty under Rule 18 of Central Excise...

Refund of unutilized Cenvat credit - Other than Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, there is no other provision either in Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 or in Central Excise...

Quick Updates: