Confiscation of goods and levy of penalty - There is no ...

Confiscation and Penalty Imposed on Appellant; Mis-Declaration Charges Under IS 4117-1973 (2008) Deemed Unsustainable.

March 21, 2023

Case Laws Customs AT

Confiscation of goods and levy of penalty - There is no allegation against the appellant that the disputed goods was imported for industrial use in India. Since such goods are not meant for any use in India, the same are not required to be allowed clearances in India. Hence the charges of mis-declaration of goods against the appellant by citing the non-compliance with IS 4117-1973 (2008) is completely misconceived and cannot be sustained. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Confiscation of goods and levy of penalty - There is no ...

Confiscation and Penalty Imposed on Appellant; Mis-Declaration Charges Under IS 4117-1973 (2008) Deemed Unsustainable.

March 21, 2023

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

The case involved verification of Certificate of Origin and non-compliance of FSSAI Regulations u/s 111(m) and 112(a) of the Act, 1962. The Tribunal held that the goods...

Smuggling - illegal importation of the seized gold - Confiscation of the gold and Indian currency - The Tribunal found no evidence linking the seized Indian currency to...

The case involved a challenge to the imposition of penalties and confiscation of goods under the Customs Act, 1962. The Appellate Tribunal found that the penalties...

Penalty - Confiscation of foriegn currency - carrying currency in excess of prescribed limit - penalty reduced - AT

The Appellate Tribunal found the Appellant Company guilty of contravening u/s 9(1)(a) of FERA 1973 by making payments to a person outside India without RBI permission....

The case involved the scope for retention of penalty u/s 112 of Customs Act, 1962 after liability to confiscation was set aside. Confiscation pertains to goods, while...

Penalty u/s.271(1)(c) or penalty u/s.271AAA - The provisions of Section 271AAA(3) of the Act specifically excludes the provisions of Section 271(1)(c) of the Act for the...

Accrual of income - real income - since the basis, modality and the amount on which the capacity charges, deemed generation charges and capacity Index Incentives were to...

Section 8(1) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (FERA) - To meet the charge of having acquired foreign exchange, it must be shown that the petitioner was the...

Appellate Tribunal reduced penalty imposed on company u/s 50 of FERA, 1973 from Rs.2 crores to Rs.2.5 lakhs for contravention regarding two foreign exchange remittances...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(C) - deemed income being loss claimed and disallowed - The AO has also not specified the charge on which penalty is being levied - No penalty - AT

CESTAT set aside the confiscation of foreign liquors and various foreign goods as well as penalties imposed under Sections 112(a) and 112(b) of the Customs Act, 1962...

The CESTAT held: The demand of service tax under 'site formation service' for June 2005 to May 2007 by culling out site formation charges from a composite mining...

Service tax refund claim allowed by Appellate Tribunal for additional service tax paid on charges recovered from customers. Appellant issued credit notes to customers...

CESTAT Mumbai held that confiscation of imported goods and imposition of penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act for forged Special Import Licenses lacked clear evidence...

Quick Updates: