Unexplained cash deposits during demonetization period - ...

Assessee Fails to Justify 2016 Cash Deposits with 2013 Withdrawals; Lacks Evidence for Brother's Medical Fund Claim.

May 31, 2023

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Unexplained cash deposits during demonetization period - Assessee could not also explain how the amount withdrawn in the year 2013 was made available for depositing in the year 2016, that too during demonetization period. The arguments of the assessee that money was kept for the purpose of treatment of his brother was also unproved, because no evidence has been filed to justify his arguments and further, there was no proof as to how much was spent for treatment and how much balance was available with the assessee. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Unexplained cash deposits during demonetization period - ...

Assessee Fails to Justify 2016 Cash Deposits with 2013 Withdrawals; Lacks Evidence for Brother's Medical Fund Claim.

May 31, 2023

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Cash credit u/s 68 r.w.s. 115BBE - cash deposit during demonetization period - assessee's failure to maintain books of accounts u/s 44AD. Held that where exemption from...

During the demonetization period, the assessee deposited Rs. 36.50 lacs in Specified Bank Notes (SBNs) in their bank account. The Assessing Officer (AO) made an addition...

The assessee, a septuagenarian gynecologist with no business income during the year, made cash deposits totaling Rs. 10 lakh in her bank account during demonetization....

Cash deposit during demonetization period treated as unexplained cash credit. Assessee's claim of introducing cash as capital in proprietary concern not accepted due to...

The ITAT Delhi held that the CIT(A) erred in presuming all cash deposits as business receipts u/s 44AD. The CIT(A) treated deposits as business receipts and applied 8%...

Addition on account of cash deposit during demonetization period - the assessee glumly failed to justify the genuineness of the cash on hand viz a viz its use for...

The ITAT Bangalore addressed unexplained cash deposits u/s 69A, focusing on the credibility of earlier withdrawals as a source for redeposits. The Tribunal examined fund...

Addition u/s 68 - Cash deposited in Bank - Assessee re-circulated those moneys by way of deposits, withdrawals and redeposits in the Bank A/c from time to time and the...

Cash deposits made during demonetization period from cash withdrawals and rental income received in cash were substantiated through cash flow statements and bank...

Unexplained cash deposits - Deposits in regular bank account of the assessee, during demonetization period - the assessee was maintaining complete stock tally, the sales...

Deposits by the assessee in bank account during demonetization period were not unexplained. Section 69A is inapplicable as there were proper entries for cash sales, cash...

Unexplained cash credit addition u/s 68 during demonetization period - assessee unable to substantiate contentions regarding cash receipts from sales and debt recoveries...

Unexplained money u/s 69A read with Section 115BBE(1) - no explanation regarding source of cash deposit in savings account - case selected for limited scrutiny, thus...

The assessee made cash deposits during the demonetization period which were treated as unexplained u/s 69A. However, the Tribunal held that the cash deposits were within...

The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, considered the penalty u/s 271AAA for unexplained cash found during a search. The AO rejected the assessee's submissions due to lack of...

Quick Updates: