Refund of excess duty paid - time barred or not - Section 27 of ...

High Court Denies Refund Claim Due to Late Filing u/s 27 of Customs Act; Emphasizes Importance of Timely Action.

September 5, 2023

Case Laws Customs HC

Refund of excess duty paid - time barred or not - Section 27 of the Customs Act clearly requires that any person claiming refund of any duty is to make an application in the form or manner as may be prescribed before the expiry of one year from the date of payment of such duty or interest. - it is clear that the Petitioner has been negligent in pursuing its statutory remedies and now is seeking the indulgence of this Court in its writ jurisdiction which we are not inclined to exercise - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund of excess duty paid - time barred or not - Section 27 of ...

High Court Denies Refund Claim Due to Late Filing u/s 27 of Customs Act; Emphasizes Importance of Timely Action.

September 5, 2023

Case Laws Customs HC

You may also like:

Yearly Claim of refund of unutilized cenvat credit - Notification number 27/2012 contemplates for filing of refund claims of unutilised Cenvat credit quarterly, but it...

Refund claim of late fee mistakenly paid - late fee waived off by public notice no.21/2020 - It is found that the Revenue is taking a contradictory stand in as much as...

Refund claim - The decision of ITC Limited is not applicable to the present facts and circumstances of the case as at the time of filing of Bills of Entry, the appellant...

The period of limitation of one year does not apply when the amount claimed as refund has been paid under protest. Section 27 of the Customs Act, 1962, only recognizes...

Refund of unutilized cenvat credit - validity of SCN - As per the Notification No.27/2012, there is no requirement to debit in the service return, the only requirement...

Petitioner diligently pursued refund claim. Payments delayed due to arbitration dispute. Refund claim filed timely with jurisdictional authority. Delay occurred due to...

Refund of pre-deposit - refund claim filed by the CHA is proper or otherwise - It is not the case that whether CHA is claiming the refund. Those are applications of...

Refund claim - Bar of limitation - Respondent filed refund claim consequential to the dropping of demand under adjudication order dated 27/11/2009 within 3 months -...

Relevant date for filing of Refund - It is settled that even if the refund claim is filed well within the time and the same is returned for want of clarification or...

Refund of duty paid - filing of refund claim before the wrong jurisdiction - if the adjudicating authority was of the view that the appellant has not filed refund claim...

Refund of duty paid - filing of refund claim before the wrong jurisdiction - if the adjudicating authority was of the view that the appellant has not filed refund claim...

The ITAT Delhi held that denial of Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) claim due to late filing of Form 67 after the due date of filing Income Tax Return (ITR) was not justified....

CESTAT ALLAHABAD held that refund claim for service tax under section 65 of Finance Act, 1994 was not time-barred as the relevant date for refund claim was the date of...

Claim of refund - Period of limitation - the refund was filed by the appellant on 27.10.2016 and Notification reducing the rate of ADD was issued on 29.01.2016. Firstly,...

The CCST clarifies the applicability of late fees for delayed filing of FORM GSTR-9C under the APGST Act, 2017. Late fees under section 47 are leviable for incomplete...

Quick Updates: