Clandestine removal - In the light of sanctity of section 9D of ...

Court Sets Aside Demand Due to Denial of Cross-Examination; Breach of Section 9D of Central Excise Act, 1944.

October 5, 2023

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Clandestine removal - In the light of sanctity of section 9D of Central Excise Act, 1994, the outcome of the notices can rest squarely on statements that comply thereon and any documents, including ‘data repository’, that are, substantially, unchallenged - The plea for cross-examination of witnesses were made before the adjudicating authority. Both were willfully and deliberately denied in breach of statutory mandate of section 9D of Central Excise Act, 1944. - Demand set aside - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Clandestine removal - In the light of sanctity of section 9D of ...

Court Sets Aside Demand Due to Denial of Cross-Examination; Breach of Section 9D of Central Excise Act, 1944.

October 5, 2023

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) set aside the impugned order and remanded the cases back to the adjudicating authority. The appellants...

Violation of principles of natural justice - denial of cross-examination - revocation of customs broker license, forfeiture of security deposit, and penalty imposed by...

The High Court addressed a case involving a violation of natural justice principles due to the rejection of the petitioner's request for cross-examination in a matter...

Service tax demand on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services rendered on reverse charge basis set aside as appellant did not collect service tax from service recipient....

Validity of reassessment order u/s 147 - Denial of Cross-Examination Opportunity - Reliance of statement of third party - The High Court noted that the petitioner did...

Demand of duty - receipt of inputs or not - demand based on statements of the suppliers of the inputs - cross-examination not allowed - Revenue has no other evidence -...

The AT rejected appellant's contention that denial of cross-examination of departmental officers violated natural justice principles. The tribunal distinguished between...

Seizure of tobacco and loss of the same due to file - Liability of central excise department - Whether the Trial Court has committed error of facts and law in passing...

Demand of duty - cross examination - matter set aside and restored to adjudicating authority for de novo adjudication after permitting the cross objection - AT

The AT dismissed the appeals challenging denial of cross-examination requests for officers who recorded statements under the Customs Act and FERA. The tribunal...

Confiscation of imported liquor cases, imposition of penalties, and demand of duty. The Tribunal held that there was no intentional misdeclaration or fraudulent intent...

Clandestine removal demand based on electricity consumption not sustainable as mere electricity consumption cannot be the sole basis for determining duty liability....

Denial of cross-examination process of witness - ACIT restricted cross examination process by denying the questions asked by the Petitioner during cross examination -...

Clandestine Removal - threshold limit of SSI Exemption - third party evidences reliable or not - It is settled that statements of dealers and transporters and the...

Violation of principles of natural justice - opportunity for cross-examination. Evidentiary value of statements recorded u/s 14 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 cannot be...

Quick Updates: