Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - Transfer pricing adjustment - Debatable ...

High Court Deletes Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) in Transfer Pricing Case Due to Debatable Base Erosion Theory Issue.

October 30, 2023

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - Transfer pricing adjustment - Debatable issue - Base Erosion Theory - Reading a particular paragraph of the observations of the AO’s order reproduced by the CIT(A) itself would indicate that there were two views possible and that the issue was debatable. - Penalty was rightly deleted - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - Transfer pricing adjustment - Debatable ...

High Court Deletes Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) in Transfer Pricing Case Due to Debatable Base Erosion Theory Issue.

October 30, 2023

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - addition on account of Transfer Pricing adjustment relating to payment of commission - it is evident that these are debatable issues - In any...

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Transfer Pricing adjustment made - applying the analysis of the term ‘good faith’ and ‘due diligence’ we are of the considered view that in the...

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income - adjustment made u/s 92CA - penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) on the adjustment made u/s 92CA is not...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - recording of specific finding or not? - In para 7 of the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), the Assessing Officer held that it is found to be a fit...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - proof of contravention of provisions provided under explanation 5A to section 271(1)(c) - On reference to the provisions of explanation 5A to...

Defective notice issued u/s 274 read with Section 271(1)(c) for levying penalty. The key points are: The phrases "conceal" and "furnishing of inaccurate particulars" in...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of the deduction claimed by the assessee u/s 35 - AO has not brought out his case as to why penalty u/s.271(1)(c) of the Act...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of bogus purchases by applying the profit rate - Once there is no reason to disbelieve the sales made by the assessee and...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - addition u/s 68 - the entire addition itself becomes debatable one. It is well settled proposition of law that the penalty u/s 271(1)(c)...

The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - failure to comply with the notices issued by the A.O u/s 142(1) - the non-compliance on the part of the assessee is due to the reason of...

Levy of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) in case of voluntary surrender of income - disallowance of claim of loss - Assessee offered the loss voluntarily to avoid litigation and...

Quick Updates: